TRAINING
NEED IDENTIFICATION OF THE ORGANIZATION
Introduction
Training need is precisely defined
as the GAP between the expected standards
( of knowledge, skills, behaviours & attitudes) and the existing standards.
The close in the gap becomes the objective of a training program. To know the
gaps, between the expected and existing performance , we must know the existing
levels of performance first and for that
there are many methods and step by step scientific process.
Importance
Assessing
the training need is important because, basically, rolling out a training
program incurs an EXPENSE and training department in a company, or a training
program by an external trainer, needs to give an ROI, a return on investment,
in terms of performance and increase the revenue of the company, contribute to
the profitability or reduce some an expense and save some money for the
company. Here area few steps involved.
The
first step in the TNA is to ensure that the organisation has clear, focused
business objectives. These should be agreed by top management (usually the top
and senior managers in other organisations) so that a clear idea of what the
organisation is trying to achieve is understood by everyone in it.
A
training needs analysis (TNA) is the process of identifying the areas where
both individuals and groups in an organisation would benefit from training in
order to become more effective at achieving their own objectives and the
objectives of the organisation.
Basic
steps:
1. Identifying the objectives of the
organisation
2. Appointing a training co-ordinator
3. Gathering information about the skills
and abilities of the individuals that are needed now and will be needed in the
future
4. Analysing that information
5. Identifying the gaps that exist between
the current situation and what is/will be required
Each
of these steps will be the subject of separate articles in the series. This
second article looks at the whole process in outline and how a TNA links into
the overall management of the organisation.
Popular
methods of TNA
There
are generally, 6 popular methods of conducting a Training Need Analysis.
- Training
Need Survey / Questionnaire method.
- Competence
Analysis Method of Training Neeeds.
- Preferrence
Analysis
- Task
Analysis method.
- Feed
back & Recommendation method.
- Management
Decision method.
Training
Needs Identification Diagram
Steps Involved
A.
The training plan
Sometimes
training is not really planned at all. Rather than being a proactive process
training tends to be much more reactive. So, when a dental nurse is overheard
on the telephone talking to a patient in an inappropriate manner some kind of
training is then perceived as being needed, or may be provided there and then.
Most
dental organisations have a basic plan for the clinical training staff, whether
a dental nurse or junior clinician. However, an integrated training plan for
the whole organisation may be lacking, leaving individuals to train others in a
different fashion. In a group practice, for example, different dentists may
well be providing very different levels of training for their dental nurses and
even for the receptionists.
A
training plan should prevent the confusion and ultimate inefficiency that tends
to result from these ad hoc approaches, because a training plan should cover
the whole organisation and should be consistent. That consistency starts with
agreement of what the organisation is trying to achieve and what the priorities
are at the moment.
Without
this coherence training usually consists of individuals attending courses
without the realization that it might be cheaper and more effective to engage a
trainer to provide training within the organisation; or that money is being
spent on training without any clear idea of what that training is trying to
achieve. Different people will often be attending courses on the same subject
unnecessarily, or going to courses in areas they are already competent at (but
enjoy) or are interested in rather than in areas that are required in order for
the organisation to meet its current objectives.
B. Clear
objectives
The
first step in the TNA is to ensure that the organisation has clear, focused
business objectives. These should be agreed by top so that a clear idea of what
the organisation is trying to achieve is understood by everyone in it.
Usually
this requires a mission statement (ideally a single sentence describing the chief
aim of the organisation) and a set of strategic objectives. These objectives
should tell everyone what the organisation thinks is important (its values) and
what people should be focusing on (their jobs).
Based
on these objectives it is possible to assess which areas of the overall
business plan take priority at the moment, and which areas link with other
areas. In our example of increasing gross income by 20% (which is a financial
objective) we will obviously need to consider both selling and marketing
objectives as well as possibly customer care and clinical care. There may well
be topics in all of these areas that will need to be considered in order for
the overall objective to be achieved.
C.Appointing a
training co-ordinator
Even
in the smallest organisation it is worth appointing a training co-ordinator.
The
reason is that training needs to be part of someone's job. If it is not, it
tends to get left out and that is one of the reasons why training is so often
poorly planned and implemented.
Often
the training co-ordinator can also be the training administrator (the person
who books the courses or organises the training sessionsTop of page
D.
Gathering knowledge
· What do people need to do in order
that the objective is achieved?
· What skills and knowledge do people
already possess?
· What skills and knowledge may be
required in the future to continue to achieve future objectives?
Once
we are clear on our objectives and have a training co-ordinator appointed then
we can begin to gather knowledge about what needs to be done, what is being
done and how well the people involved are doing it.
We
can divide the knowledge required into three areas:
1. What do people need to do in order that
the objective is achieved?
2. What skills and knowledge do people
already possess?
3. What skills and knowledge may be
required in the future to continue to achieve future objectives?
Not
all information will relate to training !
E.
Analysing the
information
The
analysis
The
analysis should be answering the basic questions:
1. What
gaps exist in both knowledge and ability of the current people in the
organization to carry out their jobs now?
2.
What
gaps exist in both knowledge and ability of the current people in the
organization to carry out their jobs in the future?
This
stage in the TNA is both stimulating and challenging. Analytical skills are
required, and time to carry out the analysis is essential. If the organisation
is to benefit from the effective use of resource in training then the person
carrying out the TNA must be free to carry out a full and proper analysis. If
not, the whole process is self-defeating and often the process is blamed for
failure rather than the lack of resource to carry it out properly.
The
analysis should be answering the basic questions:
1. What gaps exist in both knowledge and
ability of the current people in the organization to carry out their jobs now?
2. What gaps exist in both knowledge and
ability of the current people in the organization to carry out their jobs in
the future?
Thus
the TNA allows for both current gaps relating to current job descriptions and
possible gaps assuming some form of future development. For example a dental
practice might be considering converting to a private capitation plan, which
would require specialized training in the particular plan plus possible selling
and marketing training (if applicable).
The
analysis leads naturally into the final stage of the TNA.
F.
Identifying
the gaps
This
final stage is really indistinguishable from the analysis in practice, but is
given a separate heading because the way you actually record the gaps can be
important for the application of the TNA. Some method is required of recording
those gaps in a way that facilitates the next stage following a TNA – drawing
up a training plan.
G. Formulating The training plan
This
is because the whole point of the TNA is the actual planning and implementation
of relevant training for the people in the organization.
Training
plans should be documents the organisation uses to plan the training of
everyone, costed out and budgeted for. They are working documents (in other
words they keep changing as events and circumstances change) and form the core
of investment in the development of the people. They are also the end result of
the TNA, as it is hardly worth investing all that time and effort in
identifying training needs if nothing happens as a result.
H.
Conclusion
We
have so far looked at the basics of a
training needs analysis, considering the broad model itself. Thus a TNA is
quite simply a way of identifying the existing gaps in either knowledge or
ability of the people in the organization to carry out the tasks that enable
them to do their jobs. The process assumes that the jobs people carry out have
been defined in order that the business objectives of the organization will be
achieved. Thus a training needs analysis will ensure people are better able to
do their jobs because they have improved their knowledge and their skills in
relevant areas.
TRAINING NEED
IDENTIFICATION IN MY ORGANIZATION
For
identification of training needs, I have selected the company , I have been
working for, of which I am employee, that is, Peerless General Finance and Investment company Ltd, whose
details are given below.
:
ABOUT THE COMPANY
Peerless
General Finance was established in 1932 at Kolkota as its Head Quarters, with
presence in all states in India, has been one of the oldest financial
institutions in the country. It is a
privately owned, closely held, limited company with more than 50 partners and a
Board of directors for guidance and MD ( 1 of the promoters and biggest
partner) running the day to day affairs of the company.
Peerless
has 180 branches all over the country and Mr.S.K.Roy is the managing director,
who was also the recipient of ‘ Padma Shree’ award in 2009, for social service
and Corporate Social Responsibility.
Since
2007, company is in the business of financial product distribution, selling
Life Insurance products, General Insurance products and mutual funds.
Peerless
has always weathered many storms and withstood the changes that happened in
Indian financial market space ; changed that affected the company severely. It
had to re-invent itself to survive. Many times over.
Beginnings : As a Life
Insurance company ( Avataar 1)
For
instance, it started as a Life Insurance company in 1932. It went on till 1956 as a successful Life
Insurance company. Then, in 1956, this business was nationalized and LIC was
formed. Peerless went out of business.
Re-invention 1 : From
Life to General Insurance ( Avataar 2 )
Then
the company started General Insurance business ( vehicle, health, and marine,
fire, property insurances ) in 1957. It went on till 1972. Then again, General
Insurance business in India was nationalized under Mrs.Indira Gandhi and
Peerless AGAIN went out of business !!
Re-invention 2 : From
General Insurance to Non Banking ( Avataar 3)
Peerless
had to reinvent itself, all over again. It has taken up the business of
Residual Non Banking business , and in its new avatar, it is called an RNBC
company. Collecting deposits, fixed and recurring and giving maturities with
interest stipulated by Reserve Bank of India, is the main business.
Soon
enough, company has become a leading RNBC organization among all non banking
finance companies. So far, company has settled maturity payments worth
Rs.19,000 crores !
Company
operated this business with the agents channel, with 50,000 agents spreading
all over the country , attached to its 180 branches all over India, in almost
every district of the country. It went on smoothly from 1972 to 2007.
As
luck would have it, RBI has made some policy changes in non banking finance
business in year 2007 and asked Peerless to wind up its RNBC business by year
2014 !!
Thankfully,
this time, company had 7 years to redefine its business and reinvent itself,
with some new business, which is related to its existing business and not too
far away from its core strengths.
Re-Invention 3 : From
Non Banking , back to Insurance business ! Avataar 4!
At
that time, insurance business was booming in India and was growing at a rapid
pace of nearly 40% a year. Since
Peerless had its branches, employees, infrastructure, computers, and MOST
important, agents spread across all over India, they thought distribution of
Insurance ( Life & General ) and Mutual Funds, is close to its core
strengths. Thus, the wheel has turned a
full circle for Peerless ; it came back to the business it started with, in
1932 !
It
had to hire experienced hands in this business, as the domain is new to them.
Competent people form HR, Sales, Operations, and Training , were hired.
Training department had most challenging job of re-skilling the massive agent
force to sell new products, impart new concepts and adapt to a different style
of selling.
Company Network and
Presence :
It
has 16 Regional Offices ( under which are branches ) and a staff of
approximately 2,000 on its pay roll, apart from agents , aka ‘ Field Force’.
The
company has predominantly rural presence . Although the firm has branches in
every district head quarters, it’s in the surrounding villages that the agents
are concentrated.
After
RBI has asked the company to close down its existing business, Peerless now has
a challenging task ahead of it, having entered insurance ( life and general) and mutual funds
distribution business.
With
a massive task of training, re-skilling the existing field force of 50,000
agents all across the contry, 2000 staff, with the help of a Training Head, 8
Regional Training Managers and 60 guest
trainers who are not on pay roll, hired and paid on per session basis.
Company
has also hired experienced hands in HR, Operations and sales, apart from
Training, from insurance industry, to guide the organization into new vistas,
new business.
That,
in a nutshell, is about the company and the task cut out for it .
ORGANISATIONAL
CHART PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE
Board of Directors
Managing Director
V.P. Sales V.P.Finance G.M.Opeations V.P.HR

G.M.Sales Regional Accountants G.M.Training


Regional Sales Managers Regional Trainers





Branch Manager Guest Trainers
ABM sales ABM Operations Sales Officers Operations Staff
Field Mentors
Agents and Field sales force
Target
Audience for Training :
- Field Mentors.
- Agents and Field Sales Force.
- Branch Managers.
Note : Target Audience
, highlighted.
METHODOLOGY FOR
FINDING OUT THE TRAINING NEEDS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The
training needs of the company have emerged, at Organizational level as well as
at individual level. For the training needs to emerge, we followed the process mentioned below :
- Survey
Method. Making
questionnaires, aimed at the recipients of training, the head of the group
which needs the training ( Branch Managers, in this case), the business
head, whose targets and budgets are rolled out, the service staff engaged
in delivering the service to internal customers ( agents / field) and
external customers ( actual buyers of our products). Questionnaire
and the consolidated responses are attached here.
- Drawing
from the own experience
of the Training Head of the company ( DGM – Learning solutions, 8 Regional
Training Managers , of which I am a part). We all come from various life
insurance companies and our collective experience was synthesized before
we went on to decide about the methodology of finding the training needs
and finalizing a method.
- Current
Practices Observation.
Observations of competitors & peers within the industry. There are
other companies and organizations involved in selling and distribution of
Life Insurance, General Insurance and Mutual Funds. What training strategies
THEY have in place ? Content ?
Delivery mechanism ? Internal training or outsourced ? Methods for
evaluation ?
- Best
Practices documents
– peer group in the industry. There are companies in similar business.
What are the best practices they are adhering to , which are creating a
positive impact on their companies ? We have pooled these market
intelligence resources so that the following training needs emerged.
- REGULATORY
POINT OF VIEW
: What kind of training, does the industry regulator, the IRDA stipulates
and mandates ? What are those trainings we should impart ( and to whom) ,
in order to comply with the existing regulations ?
For instance , we deal with 3
verticles. Life
Insurance and General ( Non Life ) Insurance sector are regulated by IRDA (
Insurance Regulator & Development Authority of India). Regulator stipulates that all agents and
staff members need to under go compulsory
50-hour training
On concepts , products and processes and
documentation needs.
Mutual Funds Industry is regulated
by SEBI ( Security & Exchange Board of India). It stipulates that both
agents and operations staff need to undergo certain type of training. Branch
Managers should compulsorily pass AMFI ( Association for Mutual Funds in India
) test and must be certified.
RBI, and Ministry of Finance has its
own regulations under income tax benefits and reliefs and want us to train our
people on tax aspects.
In
Financial sector, regulatory aspect is utmost important since it
deals with public money.
FINAL
TRAINING NEEDS DETERMINATION
: We had a discussion.
1. Training
team and its collective experience.
2. Observation
of Peer group companies within the industry.
3. Training Needs as seen by Training team.
4. Training
needs as seen by the recipients of training, that is sales team. Field and
staff.
5. Trainings
mandated by the regulator.
6. Training
needs, as felt by the top management,
and collated the information to formulate the training strategy ( see
chapter : “ Findings from the methods employed & from groups interviewed).
Training
Needs Assessment Diagram
QUESTIONNAIRE ON TRAINING
NEEDS : 1 EACH TO THREE GROUPS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here
are the questions from our questionnaire , out of which, stake holders opinions
and inputs were sought, on Training Needs at Peerless. These interviews were
conducted at 3 levels with Three sets of
people .
- Recipients of Training : Our field ( agents) and
service and administration staff at office ( Line and Staff).
- Immediate supervisors : People in the hierarchy to
whom , the above Line & Staff report to : i.e., Branch managers,
Marketing Officers.
- Top and Middle Management : Regional Sales Managers,
General Manager-Sales, Vice President-Sales etc. ( do it 5 questions)
Here
are 3 separate formats for three
different stake holders.
QUESTIONNAIRE
I : ON TRAINING NEEDS
- To The Field and Staff (
Recipients of Training )
- Now
that our company is shifting its line of business from RNBC ( Residuary
Non Banking Company) to FPD ( Financial Products Distribution), what are your thoughts about our
company’s prospects ?
- In
this type of new line of business ( FPD) what do you think are our
company’s traditional strengths and weaknesses ?
- In
order to turn our inexperience into opportunity, what are the areas on
which , do you think you need training ?
- You
are the person ( field person) who is in direct contact with the end
customer and in direct contact with him /her. What type of new knowledge
do you think you should acquire ? How will it help you in new line of
business ?
- Sales
people in this Insurance industry :
What are the important knowledge areas , that they MUST be proficient in,
for lasting success ?
- Apart
from acquiring new knowledge about the new domain, what new skills do you
think, our sales people should acquire, in order to be successful in this
business ?
- Do you think, Domain related inputs would
be enough for you to enable you to succeed in business ?
- We
have different regulators ( RBI, SEBI, & IRDA) for different business
verticals. What in your opinion, might be more important regulatory
aspects, that MUST be included in our training programs ?
- How important are ‘ Role Plays’ for
practicing sales pitch and how much time, do you think should be given for
them in a session ?
- How
important is ‘ on field ‘training on ‘ one to one ‘ basis, and how can
training managers help you in this area ? What are the benefits ?
QUESTIONNAIRE
II ON TRAINING NEEDS
To
Immediate Supervisors ( Branch & Area Sales Managers )
- How
do you think Training can enable you and your team of people, to achieve
their targets ?
- What
are the inputs you want – in our product related training to the field
force ?
- What
regulatory aspects do you think, are too important to miss and must be
included in field training session s ?
- Job
profile of your operation & customer service staff – has changed due
to change in business vertical. What new training inputs they need, to
help them in their key deliverables and excel in their new profiles?
- General
insurance is also a new business vertical for us. What training inputs are
important for your Sales Officers, to help them meet expectations ?
- We
work in a network business model ? What key skills do your Team Leaders
need ? What are the areas they need improvement on ? What content do you
suggest ?
- Do
you think behavioural patterns of your staff or sales people needs
improvement or change and what behavioral trainings do you think are
required ? What are main ‘ pain areas’ as of now ?
- What
problems do you face usually , in interpersonal aspect of your business
and who are the target segment that needs training on this aspect ?
- As
we depart from selling deposit products ( with guaranteed return) to
market linked product ( which do
not offer such gurantee ), what new orientation do sales people need and
what training inputs are required ?
Questionnaire
III on Training Needs : To Top &
Middle Management
- Now that you have entered into
a new vertical, how is the job profile of your different line managers and
staff going to change ? And what new skills do they require ?
- Has the job description of your
various line managers and middle managers changed, as a result of your
foray into new business ? If so, what are the new key deliverables ? What
type of re-skilling and training would they need, to ENABLE them ?
- In the new business vertical of
Insurance, have your expectations from your field force ( agents ) changed
? What new inputs do they need , to enable them , to fulfill those
expectations ?
- This business is totally new to
you , even though you are a general manager / middle manager. In the changed
situation, what new inputs do you need from Training Department ?
- What are your expectations on
the newly formed Training Department ? What do you think, their focus
areas should be ?
- Apart from sales &
marketing functions, which other functions
do you feel, should be trained and re-skilled thoroughly, to make
them to do their work better ?
- Now that you are entering a new
business, from non-banking to Insurance & Mutual funds, is there any
RESISTANCE from employees,
functions and departments ? If there is, how do you think it should be
overcome ? How can Training Department help you in this problem area, to
take all people along ?
- You are very bullish about the
prospects of the organization, naturally. What career progression plans do
you have for your key employees ?
Where do you see some of them, 3 years hence forth ? To help them
to reach there, what new skills and
competences do they need ?
- What new knowledge areas do
your employees need, who have bright prospects in your company ?
- What are the core competencies
and weaknesses of the company ? In which areas have they traditionally
done well ? Which areas are you traditionally weak ? Should we focus on
building on our strengths ? Or on working on our weak areas ? How can
Training Department help you, in either case ?
FINDINGS
FROM THE METHODS EMPLOYED & FROM THE GROUPS INTERVIEWED
We
have broadly classified Training Needs
as ( from stake holders
perspective)
(a)
Organizational Needs
(b)
group needs
(c) special needs, if any.
Three
Groups
were identified ( from functional perspective)
(1)
Front line sales people ( agents)
(2)
Marketing officers & Branch Manager – Supervisory staff.
(3)
Service, & administration & Operations staff.
From
Individual perspective, three types of training needs were identified.
1.Knowledge
based inputs.
2.
Skills based Inputs.
3.
Special needs/ Inputs.
Organizational Needs : (
for all categories, all functions, all levels)
These
are the knowledge areas that EVERYONE in the organization should be aware of.. irrespective
of their function, responsibilities and job deliverables. That is , Sales,
Marketing, Administration, Customer Service, Operations, Accounts, Finance HR,
I.T ; every one.
I.
Domain
Based Inputs :
a. Concepts
of Life Insurance ( how it works etc), General Insurance, Mutual Funds.
b. About
the principal companies we deal
with, whose products we distribute.
c. About
the REGULATORY point of view of each
business vertical. Namely, Reserve Bank of India, Insurance Regulatory
Development Authority (IRDA ), Security Exchange Board of India ( SEBI).
d. Concepts
of different ‘ Financial Instruments’
such as Debt, Equity, Gilt, Liquid Fund. What are they ? Who manages them ? How
they differ from one another ?
II.
Process Based Inputs ( To All functions : sales, operations, IT,
finance , admin )
1.
How to log- in a policy, send receipt to
customer. How to settle a claim. What types of documents, age proofs, address
proofs, income proofs, health proofs are required from customers. What medical
tests are required. How to settle claims. Death claims. Accident claims.
Hospitalization claims.
2.
Who are the outsourced service providers,
given by our principal companies. How to contact them , interact with them, and
provide service to customers .
The
above three are the knowledge areas everyone working for the organization
should know – to enable smooth change management and the Training Department
was given this task.
Group
/ Function / Knowledge based Training of the sales force
A. :
Product Related Inputs
The
following are the companies and products we distribute, at Peerless. Because,
we needed to transform our agents from relationship selling to ‘ knowledge’
based selling.
- Life
Insurance Products of Max New York Life Insurance Company, a Gurgaon based
company.
- General
( Non Life) Insurance products of IFFCO-Tokio General Insurance Company,
also a Gurgaon based company.
- Mutual
Funds of the following fund houses / asset management companies : Reliance
Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Sundaram
Mutual Fund, Tata Mutual Fund –to name a few. Peerless has come out with
its own mutual fund, the Peerless Mutual Fund.
Hence,
out agent ought to have the knowledge of (a) the companies (b) the products
they design and distribute (c) sales process (d) Key benefits they offer to
customers (e) how they differ from competitors’ products in the market and (f)
why the customer should buy from us, when there are so many alternative
products in the markets , viz., our Unique Selling Points.
B.Process
Training for Life Insurance – For the Sales Force :
How to choose a customer, medical tests criteria. Death claim process
Partical withdrawal process. Nomination. Assignment. Need for age proof,
identity proof, anti money-laundering guidelines, need for PAN number etc.
C.Process Training for
General Insurance Non Life – (for Sales Force ): Accident Claim process for
Vehicles. Hospitalization claim process for medical insurance. Exceptions and
clauses. Proofs and documents required. Third Party Administration process.
Income tax laws .
D.Mutual Funds Process
– ( for sales force) :
Investment process. Documents needed at the time of investing. Proofs
needed and forms to be filled – at the time of partial or full withdrawals,
switching etc.
Group / Functional
Needs .
Training Needs for
Service & Administration Staff
They
are not directly into selling but do deal with lot of customer walk in. The
Training needs, after interviewing the Branch Mangers, Regional Manger and
Senior agents ( who are internal customers to our office staff), the following
Training Needs emerged.
- Product
knowledge – pertaining to all companies products that we deal with.
- Process
knowledge – including business log
in and claim settlement.
- Escalation
matrix, in case of problems in smooth transaction, such as non receipt of
Bonds, and renewals etc.
- Computer
skills – required for business log in.
Individual
Needs
So
far, we have covered Organization Needs
for Training. What training needs the Organization has, in order to achieve its business targets and
goals, in the medium term and long term.
Now,
for the organization to succeed at institutional level, EACH INDIVIDUAL also
must succeed, at personal level ! When all individuals involved will succeed in
their goals, naturally and automatically, organization too, will succeed in its
mission.
Here
are the individual needs of sales people ( field) identified : If they are
proficient in the following skills , they are more likely to succeed, at
individual level.
Group
/ Functional needs : Skill Based Training to the Field ( Agents )
- Fact
finding skills ( for risk profiling etc)
- presentation
skills ( pertaining to products)
- Objection
handing skills
- Closing
skills
- Referral
/ Lead generation skills.
Special
Needs for Network Marketing Company life Peerless General Finance. ( To
marketing Officers and Branch Managers )
We
operate in an 18 Tier and 5 Tier structure on network marketing. Hence, our
agents, apart from selling skills, must have some interpersonal and leadership
skills also, in order to drive their teams to optimum performance. Such as
1.Goal
Setting.
2.Team
Building and team management
3.Leadership
skills.
- Coaching
and mentoring skills. Councelling skills.
- Time
Management skills.
- public
speaking skills.
- Social
networking skills.
Special needs for the administration / service staff :
- Basic
under writing and scrutiny of proposal forms .
- Computer
related inputs. Such as login in.
Special Needs for
Middle Management & Team Leaders ( Group / Organizational )
- Goal
setting.
- Team
building and team management.
- Leadership
skills for multi level marketing set up ( needs different leadership
skills, since the field are not PAID employees and formal authority does
not work !)
- Time
Management skills.
- Public
speaking and motivational skills.
- Other
interpersonal skills.
- Social
networking and recruitment skills.
Method of Delivery :
Considering the rural back ground of our
agents, their educational levels etc, it was suggested to us that, we should
not CRAM all these products into one session. For instance, on training session
should deal with Life Insurance products and concepts. Another session may deal
with Non Life products and a separate session for mutual funds etc.
Quiz :
For
knowledge based evaluation, it was
suggested to us that , there should be a QUIZ at the end of every training
session and Cash Gifts and small item gifts should be given to most active
participants, who score high.
Hand Outs
: In Vernacular language only.
Duration :
: One day per session. Keeping in view, the retention limitations of our
field. To the same audience, another session can be repeated after 10 days or
15 days.
Places of Delivery :
Since our rural base of agent network is spread out in villages, we
decided to deliver ‘ pocket ‘ trainings. Going to the remote villages, hiring a
hall and delivering the training, instead of calling all of them to our branch,
to maximize attendance and involvement.
Summary :
Training Need Analysis at Peerless General Finance has been an
exhaustive exercise. There are so many stake holders with expectations , from
them and on them. It’s a complex network of field agents in MLM structure and
staff supporting them.
We
spoke to , and conducted interviews with The Heads of Sales ( Vice President
and General Mangers for each vertical) , Middle managers and branch managers,
|
|
GROUP
NEEDS OF TRAINING : TABULAR REPRESENTATION
GROUP NEEDS. FRONT LINE SALES
FORCE ( AGENTS)
SRL NO
|
NAME OF THE AGENT
|
TRAINING NEED
|
1.
|
P.Venkateswar
Rao
|
Unit
Linked Products knowledge
|
2
|
M.Naresh.
|
Investment
Patterns : Life Insurance
|
3
|
V.Mohan
Sharnkar
|
Prospecting
skills
|
4
|
S.Niranjan
|
Lead
generation skills
|
5
|
M.S.Prasad
|
Recruitment
Skills
|
6
|
N.D.M.Raju
|
Presentation
skills
|
7
|
K.Veeraiah
|
Selling
to high networth customers
|
8
|
Rayachoti
Nagaraju
|
Mutual
Funds Products Knowledge
|
9
|
Rajam
Peta Nagaraju
|
Industry
Updates and Inputs
|
10
|
Ch.Chandra
Sekhar
|
Communication
skills
|
11
|
J.V.N.Sudhakar
|
Selling
Traditional Products
|
12
|
Hanumantha
Rao
|
Motor
Insurance basics
|
13
|
Kammari
Venkatesh
|
Health
Insurance Knowledge
|
14
|
S.V.Gopal
|
Mutual
Fund regulatory inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SALES SUPERVISORY STAFF
|
MARKETING OFFICERS / BR.MANAGER
|
|
|
GROUP NEEDS
|
|
Mr.Venu Gopal.
|
1. Conceptual inputs of domains.
|
|
Mr.Paresh Nath Sinha
|
2.Company related inputs
|
|
Mr.Satish Kumar
|
3.Regulatory aspects
|
|
Mr.K.Satyanarayana Murthy, BM
|
3.Product training
|
|
|
4.Process based training.
|
|
|
5. Inter personal skills.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL /
ORGANIZATIONAL NEEDS OF SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
NON SALES / ADMIN AND
|
SERVICE STAFF
|
Mrs.K.V.Krishna
Sodary
|
OCCUPATIONAL/ORGANIZATIONAL NEED
|
Mrs.Radha Rani
|
1. Conceptual inputs of domains.
|
Mr.P.V.Ramana
|
2.Company related inputs
|
Mr.T.R.S.Raju
|
3.Product training
|
V.Vinay Kumar.
|
4.Process based training.
|
Mrs.Sneha Latha
|
5.Service & Claim Settlerment training
|
Mr.Naga Lakshmi
|
6.Basic underwriting
|
Mrs.Patel Vijaya Lakshmi Reddy
|
|
|
|
INDIVIDUAL NEEDS :
SALES STAFF - AGENTS
Mrs.Sushant Kumar Adhikary
|
INDIVIDUAL NEED
|
Mr.Samir Roy
|
1. Time Management
|
Mr.Rami Reddy
|
2.Conflict resolution.
|
Mr.Upendra
|
3.Telephone skills.
|
Mr.Srinivasa Raju
|
|
Mr.James
|
|
Mr.Kareemuddin Siddiqui
|
|
|
|
A PREFACE TO REPORT ON 5 TRAINING
SESSIONS .
Detailed
report on each of the 5 trainings sessions , adhering to the chapter flow as
suggested by our project guide, Mr.K.M.Dheer, has been discussed here. Each report provides an overview and contains
details about the background & context, training objectives ( of
organization, of training department and of the learners ), topics discussed,
content, methodology used , Aids used and initial feedback of the participants
, soon after the session.
SESSION TITLES
Training Session 1 : Introduction to
the concept of Risk, Life Insurance, Economic Value of Human Life, how to
assess the same. To
field people and agents.
Training Session 2 : New Product
Launch Training. Unit Linked Insurance Plan. Concept, Product and
selling methods. To Field people and agents.
Training Session 3 : Fundamentals of
Basic underwriting and Operations of
Life Insurance. Know Your Customer (KYC) norms and regulatory requirements. To Operations Staff.
Session 4 : Basics of Mutual Funds.
Concept . Product. Presentation methods. To agents.
Session 5 : Goal Setting, to achieve
organizational and personal goals.
To managerial and supervisory staff.
Training Session : 1
Peerless
General Finance has been a non-banking finance company selling deposit
products, guaranteed by RBI. Now, it has shifted to distributing Life Insurance
Products of Max New York Life Insurance Co.
All agents need to be trained on risk-based & market-based products
Organizational
Objective : To
enable our field force to :
(a) Do need analysis of the prospective
customer
(b) Present the product to the prospect
(c) Handle objections, if any, and give
clarifications to the prospect
(d) Close the sale and
(e) Earn a decent living and achieve the
company’s targets ( in the short term) and objectives ( in the long run)
Topic : Introduction to the concept of
Risk, concept of Life Insurance, Economic Value of Human Life and one insurance
product.
Venue : Karim Nagar.
Date :
16.August 2010.
xdx
Participant’s
Background : Our Front Line sales people . Our Agents.
Peerless General Finance works in a multi level marketing set up involving
agents. These agents are the ones who actually sell it customers.
Very
senior agents. Aged between 40 to 50 years old. With the company for the past
20 years or more. Used to selling debt based saving and deposit products. Very experienced in selling and customer
service and financial products but totally new to insurance.
Training Objective : To make the audience, familiar with
the concept of Life Insurance , types of Life Insurance, applicability. Also
train them on ONE product initially.
Learners Objective : To learn the concept and about the new
products of the new business that company undertook, and be successful in the
new area too, making good use of their existing client network and earn a good
living standards.
Content & Outline
: As mentioned earlier, Peerless General
Finance has been an RNBC ( Residuary non banking company) company, selling
interested based deposit products to customers , with returns that were
guaranteed by RBI. Now, with RBI’s directives, company has to close down RNBC
business by 2013 and hence, it chose to enter Financial Product distribution,
consisting of, among the other things, Life Insurance.
Though
the agents are well experienced in sales of financial products, and customer
handling and service, the concept of Life insurance and selling risk based
products is new to them. Hence, the importance of Training. Besides, there is a bit of anxiety and lower
levels of confidence in them, as the product line is new and they didn’t know
how to pitch it to customers.
So
, we took the instance of one such session that took place in Karim Nagar, 160
Km away from Hyderabad , where our branch was situated.
Methodology : Since
this is technical training, or ‘ to know’ training, this was instructor led ,
class room delivery was predominant. Since the subject is new and participants
had moderate education back ground and from rural area, ‘ recapture’ is required
for every 20 minutes, to check the landing and retention.
Audio Visual Aids : Lap top and projector. Total module had some
50 power point slides. ( one sample is
attached ) . A mike. Vernacular Hand outs , at the end of the session.
Feedback and Reaction
Level Evaluation
Feed
back was taken in vernacular as our trainees can’t write in English. A sample
is enclosed. Feed back , immediately after the training, has been taken at 2
levels.
- Reaction
level evaluation, as to how they felt about the training session.
- Knowledge
level evaluation, in the form of Quiz , at the end of the Training
session.
Reaction Level : The following feed back came from the
audience ( assorted).
More
such training programs should be conducted regularly. We are now more confident
about selling the new products range. We understood about the concept of Risk,
Insurance, and Economic Value of the asset called Human Life. In future, role
plays too, should be conducted. Some refresher training should be conducted ,
on the same subject, after a few weeks. Industry specific ( Insurance) news and
updates should be made part of the training sessions.
Enclosures :
Annexture
I : List of participants.
Annexture
II : Reaction Questionnaire Blank
Annexture
III : Course Hand out.
Annexture
IV: Photograph of the session.
ANNEXURE
1 : LIST OF THE PARTICIPAJNTS
:
VENUE
: KARIM NAGAR.
Date : 14.August.2011.
PARTICIPANTS
LIST
- Swargam Srinivas.
- Ambala Srinivas.
- M.Lakshman.
- M.S.N.Goud
- B.Raja Mouli.
- Sadiah.
- Moinuddin.
- Mohan Babu
- Mohan Prasad
- Devaiah.
- Mr.Mukunda Rao.
- Malla Reddy.
- Veerappa.
- Gopal Reddy.
- V.Venkateswarlu.
- Manthani Sathyanarana Reddy.
- Bhoomi Reddy
- Jalapathi Reddy.
- K.V.Veeresam Goud.
- P.Ravinder.
ANNEXURE II
REACTION
QUESIONNAIRE SAMPLE : SESSION 1
1.
To what extent, your confidence to sell,
has increased after this training ?
Great
extent 5 4 3 2 1 Not
at all.
2.
How did the trainer cover the topics ?
Excellent 5 4 4 2 1 Poor
3. How helpful was the session for you, to improve your
productivity ?
Most useful
5 4 3 2 1
Least useful .
3.
Do you think the program has achieved its
stated objectives ?
Mostly 5 4 3 2 1 Least.
4.
Has your understanding of the topic
improved after the session ? To what extent?
Mostly 5 4 3 2 1 Not at all.
5.
To what extent the training was interactive
and involved the participants ?
Very much 5 4 3 2 1 Least.
6.
Were the post training hand outs given for
further reading, adequate ?
Very much 5 4 3 2 1 Least
7.Do you feel the content , relevant to your
work ?
Very much 5 4 3 2 1 Not
at all
8.How was the ambience and venue ?
Excellent 5 4 3 2 ` Not
good.
9. What are
the 3 most useful points you learned during this session ?
1.
2.
3.
10. What
are 2 suggestions you can give us, to improve the session further in future ?
1.
Signature
of the participant : Date
:
ANNEXURE
III
COURSE HAND
OUT
INSURANCE CONCEPT
Insurance is basically about loss sharing. All other types of savings
and investments are about profit sharing. Insurance is a trust and the company,
in a way, is a trustee.
Insurance is about – ‘ Fortunate Many’ sharing the losses of the ‘
Unfortunate Few’. Only, we do not know who the unfortunate few will be. But
past records give us some pattern about the future.
Ecomonic
Assets : Every human life and property and good bought, are economic assets.
They yield us some comfort or profit. There is a cost of replacement, if they
are damanged.
Human
Life Value :: Every human life has some economic value. It
differs from person to person.
If a 30 year old person is earning Rs.5 lacs per annum. He / She will
retire at 60.
Future earning years : 30. If anything happens to him /her , their
family will lose all their future earnings, i.e., 5 lacs X 30 = Rs.1.5 crores !
This is human life value.
Activity
: Please calculate YOUR OWN human life value, based on your earnings
and your future years of service.
Risk :
Concept of Risk is associated with insurance. Risk= may or may not happens. But
if it were to happen, will create an adverse impact.
Insurable
interest : This mean, the person buying insurance, must have
financial interest in what he is insuring. That means, he / she must incur some
loss, if risk happens.
Concept
of Indemnity : Insurance is a loss sharing device. Customers
shouldn’t try to make profit out of it.
Moral
Hazard : If I try to make profit out of an adverse event, it’s called ‘ Moral
Hazard’. For example, I insure my shop and leave it to fire.
Utmost
Good Faith : Person buying insurance must reveal only true
information about him/her.
Hiding, or suppression of material fact, results in Moral Hazard.
ANNEXTURE
IV : PHOTO OF THE PARTICIPANTS
TRAINING SESSION 2
Peerless General Finance has been a Residuary
Non Banking Finance Company ( RNBC ), with presence all over India and selling
saving & deposit products , which
have fixed interest rates, through its well spread agent network, to
predominantly rural customers.
Now
with RBI directive, it has to stop selling RNBC products and hence decided to
distribute Life and General Insurance Products.
In the first round of training session rolled out pan India, we have
imparted training on the concepts of Risk and Insurance and an Endowment
Product, called ‘ Max Mangal’. Now we
need to enable them to sell Unit Linked Products, which are complex in nature.
Organizational
Objective : Unit Linked Insurance Plan
contributes more than 80% of premium
revenue to an insurance It’s important that, our agents understand the
structure of the products better. Success of this product & its acceptance are
very important for the company, from strategic and revenue point of view.
Topic :
Introduction of new Unit Linked Insurance Products about to be launched,
and the concepts that are basis for these products.
Date. Date : 14.August.2011.
Venue : Siddipeta. Medak district
Participants
Background : Our
agents. From rural back ground. Aged about 40 to 50 years old. Experienced. Education : Up to
High School. Very few graduated. But experienced in selling and each one has
a customer list of his own. Almost
all are men, except one or two, women agents.
Training Objective : To enable our field force (
agents) to sell these complexly structured Unit Linked Insurance Plans ( ULIP s
, as they are popularly called) to their prospective customers successfully and
enable them to answer any doubts and objections , so that they can close
successfully.
Learners
Objective : To learn about these products and
be able to sell in a highly competitive insurance industry ( with 25 active
players), to convey the USP of the products, and earn regular monthly income ,
to enhance their standard of living.
Content & Outline : Now, market is flooded with ULP
products, which have 2 sections, Insurance and Investment. 80% of the revenue
to insurance companies comes from these ULIP s. This investment is market
linked and concepts of market linked and non-guranteed return must be explained
to our agent force. They are new to equity market and stock market and some
basics of stock market lingo, and concepts like NAV etc to be explained to
them. There were to be a lot of doubts
and we have to make participants to feel at ease , in asking doubts and give
clarifications.
Some
resistance from participants has to
be overcome. So long, they have been used to selling ‘ guaranteed & fixed
income’ products. Now, they have to sell (equity) market linked products, whose
returns are not guaranteed. This is the main part of resistance.
Methodology :
Class room, instructor led training. At a slow pace, in vernacular
language, so as the audience can follow. A ‘ recapture’ every 20 minutes or so.
Lecture method, with some quizzes.
Audio Visuals : Lap top and projector. Total module
had some 50 power point slides. ( one
sample is attached ) . A mike. Vernacular Hand outs , at the end of the
session.
Feedback and Reaction
Level Evaluation : “ I have had SOME understanding about how
various financial instruments work, like Debt, Equity. As we face the customers
while selling, they may ask different doubts. Hence we need a refresher
training on objection handling of these products, 15 days later. We need to
know more about stock market, customer risk profile etc. In case we have doubts
in the field, trainer should be accessible to us via his mobile phone, for some small clarifications.
Knowledge Evaluation : In the form of Quiz.
Annexture
I : HAND OUTS ; Synopsis of the
training in Telugu, vernacular language. Suggestions for further reading : ‘ Business
Section ‘ of Telugu news papers, for industry updates and regulatory updates.
Annexure II:
PHOTOGRAPH OF THE TRAINING SESSION :
Has been enclosed.
Annexture III : PARTICIPANTS LIST : Enclosed.
ANNEXTURE :I
HAND OUT FOR SESSION 2
LIFE MAKER PREMIUM :
UNIT
LINKED INSURANCE PLAN ( ULIP)
Minimum
age at Entry : 1 year.
Maximum
Age at Entry : 65 years.
Term
: 10 years to 30 years.
Minimum
Sum Assured : Rs.50,000/-
Minimum
Premium : Rs.20,000/- per annum
Mode
: Annual Mode only. No quarterly or half-yearly mode.
Sum
assured : 10 times the premium (minimum) to 30 times the premium( maximum),
depending on customer choice and preference.
Maturity
Benefit : Fund Value.
Fund
Value : No.of units on a given date X unit value.
Death
Benefit : Sum Assured or Fund Value which ever is higher.
No.of
Funds :
Super
growth fund : 100% in equity.
Growth
fund : 70% in Equity and 30% in Debt.
Balance
Fund : 50% in Equity. & 50% in Debt.
Conservative
Fund : 20% in Equity & 80% in Debt.
Secure
Fund : 100% in Debt.
Note
: Customer can choose any of the above funds or in combination of the above,
depending on his/her risk profile.
You
can help customer in risk profiling.
Premium
Payment Term : Full term.
Revival
Period : 3 years from the date of last payment ( if customer stops payment in
between).
Redirection
: Available.
Switch
between funds : Available.
Nomination
Change : Available.
Withdrawal
facility : After 3 years.
Minimum
amount of withdrawal : Rs.5,000/-/.
Minimum
Balance after withdrawal : One year premium.
ANNEXTURE : II .
PHOTOGRAPH OF THE TRAINING SESSION
ANNEXTURE : III
LIST OF PATICIPANTS : SESSION 2 :
Siddipeta , 14.Aug.2011.
List
of participants.
|
Hyderabad
Branch
|
Peerless
General Finance
|
Serial
Number
|
Agent
Name
|
Agent
Code Number
|
1
|
Md.Khairunnisa
Begum
|
191100505
|
2.
|
Bala
Narsimhaiah
|
191100573
|
3
|
Mr.Manda
Swamy
|
191100599
|
4.
|
Mrs.Amtati
Suryakala
|
19110026
|
5.
|
Mr.Govinda
Ram Ramesh
|
191100391
|
6.
|
Mr.Ch.Srinivas
|
19110425
|
7
|
Mr.Mothuku
Laxmaiah
|
191100602
|
8.
|
Mrs.M.Sharada
|
191100656
|
9.
|
Mr.Konka
Vijay Kumar
|
191100662
|
10.
|
Mr.Ch.Mallesh
|
191100698
|
11.
|
Mrs.Gattoori
Lakshmi
|
191100724
|
12.
|
Mr.Anugu
Sai Reddy
|
191100332
|
13.
|
Mr.Linga
Venkatesh
|
191100413
|
14.
|
Mr.Kemmasaram
Ramesh
|
191199374
|
15
|
Ms.V.Manjula
|
191100389
|
16.
|
Mr.Ch.Kanakaiah
|
191100422
|
17.
|
Mr.N.Bhasker
Reddy
|
191100624
|
18.
|
Mr.B.N.Suryaprakash
Raju
|
191100645
|
19.
|
Ms.Ambati
Sangeetha
|
191100703
|
20.
|
Mr.Kokkonda
Lakshmi
|
191100414
|
21.
|
Mr.Pilla
Venkatesh
|
191100421
|
22.
|
Ms.Kothakonda
Veena
|
191100536
|
23.
|
Mr.Sirisilla
Balakrishnaiah
|
191100648
|
24.
|
Mr.G.Aravind
Kumar
|
191100719
|
25.
|
Mrs.Andol
Lakshmi
|
191100719
|
26.
|
Mr.A.Mallesham
|
191100417
|
27.
|
Mr.Kothakonda
Rajeshwar
|
191100016
|
28.
|
Mr.Bejjanaboina
Kanakaya
|
191100598
|
29
|
Mr.Mudigonda
Ashok
|
191100714
|
30.
|
Mr.Perla
Naresh
|
191100720
|
31
|
Mr.Nagulapalli
Sivalingam
|
191100721
|
32
|
Mrs.B.Mamatha
|
191100054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRAINING SESSION - 3.
Peerless
General Finance has been a Residuary Non Banking Finance Company ( RNBC ), with
presence all over India and selling saving & deposit products , which have fixed interest rates, through its
well spread agent network, to predominantly rural customers.
Now it has entered Financial Product
distribution which comprises of Life and General Insurance Products and Mutual
Funds , for which, the staff are not familiar with. To familiarize them with
the products, processes, and concepts – is very important in ensuring smooth
transactions, operations and customer service, to both internal and external
customers.
Organizational
Objective : To enable the non sales and administration
staff to carry out the operational aspect of insurance . To familiarize them
with new concepts, regulations, proposal form filling etc. To enable them to
carry out the new line of business smoothly.
Topic
: Fundamentals of Basic underwriting and
operations of Life Insurance to service
& administration staff, with concepts of Insurance . Also on proposal form
filling and annextures
Date. on
10.June.2011.
Venue : Hyderabad
Participants
Background : Customer Service and administration staff.
They all have experience in non-banking business domain and are new to life
insurance, its processes and a different regulatory framework ( IRDA ) under
which, we need to complete documentation satisfactorily.
Training
Objective : Our department’s objective is to
ENABLE these experienced staff who are new to this business vertical, to fit into
new job profile and new deliverables and make them do it well. It needed a lot of new learning and a fair
amount of unlearning as well.
Learners
Objective : To perform the new line of job better and to
rise up to the new challenge. To serve the internal customers ( our agents /
field) better. Proving their worth in the new set up and enhancing their career
prospects.
Content
& Outline : The company has taken a new product line.
Service and administration staff are the key interface between our field force
and the company and the Principal Companies, whose products we distribute.
Considering the lower educational levels of our field force and agents, it’s possible
that they may make some mistakes in filling up the forms.
Principal companies reject the
applications if they find inaccurate information, insufficient information or
over writing on the application form. Sometimes, they revert to the customer,
asking for more information or seeking clarifications. This is called CFR –
Call For Requirement.
As an efficient organization, we
need to minimize the instance of CFR. One of the ways of measuring the training
effectiveness is – number of CFR s in a branch ( Hyderabad , in this case)
before and after training.
Methodology
: Class room , instructor led training – 50%. Hands-on,
activity based training, 50%. In activities, we gave them actual proposal forms
and asked them to fill the same, assuming , they are the customers. In another
case, we bought some application forms and handed over the participants and
asked them to find shortcomings. Prizes for correct diagnoses.
Case
Study method : 2. We brought 2 application forms
with common filling up mistakes. 1 containing insufficient information to log
in. How to deal with those situations and how to educate the agents about this
aspect, without offending them.
Audio
Visuals : Lap top and projector. Total module had some
50 power point slides. ( one sample is
attached ) . A mike. Vernacular Hand outs , at the end of the session.
Feedback
and Reaction Level Evaluation : Most of the audience rated the program
between ‘ Very good’ and ‘ Excellent’.
Typical responses were : I learnt a
lot about new products and processes.
About what type of proposal forms to accept and what to give back for more
information.
Basic underwriting norms and operational
norms. Compliance and guidelines.
One day training is not sufficient.
We need a refresher for every 15 days for next 2 months, meaning, 4 refreshers
in all. During which we deal with and discuss real life situation problems.
Annexure
I : HAND OUTS : The written test at the end of
the training program to the participants, is attached here with. It contains the
training content.
Annexture
II : PHOTO GRAPH : Attached.
Anexture
III : LIST OF PARTICIPANTS , NAMES ETC : Enclosed.
ANNEXURE
I : COURSE HAND OUT.
TRAINING
SESSION 3
TEST AFTER THE TRAINING / QUIZ
( Answer Sheet to this is the post
training hand out )
- Insurance
is a process of (a) Profit Sharing
(b) Loss Sharing (c) no sharing.
- What
is the meaning of ‘ Insurable Interest’ ?
- Explain
in 2 sentences, what is ‘ Utmost Good faith’ ?
- Concept
of Abrogation means (a) Risk tolerance (b) Risk aversion (c) Risk Transfer
- Total
number of signatures by customer in a proposal form ?
- (a)
1 (b) 4
(c) 6
(6)
How many types of proposal forms we have for Life Insurance Business ?
(7)
How many types of proposal forms do we have for General Insurance Business ?
What are they ?
(8)
In how many places should an agent sign ? Where do you check for his / her
signature ?
(9)
What are the standard age proofs accepted in Life Insurance business, as per
IRDA norms ?
(10)
What are the standard age proofs required for General Insurance business, as
per IRDA norms ?
(11)
What are the age proofs required for Motor Insurance ?
(12)
What is a cover note ? For how many days it is valid ?
(13)
After what age, medical tests are to be conducted ?
(14)
After what Sum Assured, should we conduct medical tests in Life Insurance ?
(15)
What are the policies we sell, which do not require any medical tests at all ?
(16) What is meant by ‘ counter offer’ ? Explain
typical situations where counter offer is given ?
(17) In General Insurance, who is a
‘ Third Party’ ?
(18) Who are the first party and
second party ?
(19) Under what circumstances, do we
get Call For Requirement from our principal companies ?
(20) Under what section, Income Tax
Relief is given to Life Insurance Customers ?
ANNEXTURE
: II
Photograph
of Training Session 3
ANNEXTURE
: III
TRAINING SESSION 3
LIST
OF PARTICIPANTS
DATE :
10.June.2011. Hyderabad.
- Mr.Jagannadham. Branch Accountant.
- Mr.Karan Kumar. Senior Accountant.
- Mr.Paresh Nath Sinha. Asst.Manager
- Mrs.Krishna Sodary , Senior Assistant.
- Mrs.Radha Rani, Senior Assistant.
- Mrs.Patel Vijaya Lakshmi Reddy , Admin.
Assistant.
- Mr.Venu Gopal. Specified person.
- Mr.Satish Kumar. Relationship Executive.
- Mr.Vijay Kumar. Admin
- Mrs.Sneha Latha. Service Asst.
- Mr.V.Lakshmi. Admin.
- Mr.Rami Reddy. Admin.
- Mr.Bhasker Reddy. Comupter Operatior.
- Mr.P.V.Ramana. Asst.
TRAINING SESSION 4
Peerless General Finance has been
a Residuary Non Banking Finance Company ( RNBC ), with presence all over India
and selling saving & deposit products ,
which have fixed interest rates, through its well spread agent network,
to predominantly rural customers.
Now
company has launched its own mutual fund, in a highly competitive market. There
are totally 37 Mutual Funds in India registered and recognized by SEBI. Both
Indian and MNC mutual funds. Total assets under management ( AUM) is nearly
Rs.8 lacs crores.
Peerless
wants to grab a pie of this huge market and hence, want to enable their vast
network of agents , with the knowledge and sales skills required to sell a
Mutual Fund. Unlike a Life Insurance, a
MF customer is a high end customer. Hence, better presentation skills and
superior service is required.
Organizational
Objective : Our
front line sales people, that is, our agents, are totally new to Mutual Fund
business. Especially, to any type of ‘ Market Linked’ investment products. To
familiarize them with the concept of Mutual Fund, money markets and equity
markets. To make them ‘ Self Reliant’ so that, they can meet High Networth
Individuals by themselves and clarify their doubts and close the sales. Without
depending on marketing officers and BM, as usually happens.
Topic :
Basics of Mutual Funds. Concept.
Process. Product ( just one ). Peerless Income Plus Fund Product training. To
Agents. For the first time, the company is launching its own Mutual Fund.
Date: 18.June.2011. 10 AM to 4 PM.
Venue : Hyderabad.
Participants
Background : Frontline sales people. Agents. Not on pay
rolls. With rural back ground. With 10 th standard or 10+2 qualification. Used
to selling saving products with guaranteed return & interest-yielding. Now,
they are required to sell market linked non-guaranteed investment products, to
different clientatale.
Training Objective : To enable the rural sales force,
hitherto used to selling guaranteed return products of fixed deposits and
recurring deposits, to sell market linked mutual funds. Under a different
regulator ( SEBI ). To enable them success in this field, since market
potential is huge and untapped in rural areas.
Learners Objective :
For the past 2 years, company has been launching so many new product
lines and products. To learn all about these new lines and products, to be able
to sell them successfully : to grab the opportunity offered by change in
business line. To enhance their monthly incomes.
Content & Outline :
In the past products, return was guaranteed by Reserve Bank and agents
did not need to understand investment basics. Now , in Mutual Fund, they need
to sell ‘ risk based products’ where, the risk, is to be borne by the customers
: returns accrue to customers too !
Here,
agents, besides understanding the financial products and equity / stock markets
, are required to understand customer profiles and different variations. They
need to do preliminary ‘ risk profiling’ of customers, understand their
different risk appetites and return expectations, and then pitch the product !
That is the challenge, in this particular training session.
Methodology
Employed : Class room, Instructor led training. With
recap, quiz and interactive discussion questions employed in between.
Audio
Visuals : : Lap top and projector. Total
module had some 50 power point slides. (
one sample is attached ) . A mike. Vernacular Hand outs , at the end of the
session.
Feedback
and Reaction Level Evaluation :
Some of the responses.
1. Extremely useful and educative.
2. We need constant, weekly update of
our Fund values and Net Asset Values.
3. We need updates on competitor Mutual
Funds NAV s in similar category.
4. We need industry refresher every 15
days.
Annexture
I : HAND OUTS
: A sample is enclosed here with.
Annexture
II : PHOTOGRAPH :
Attached.
Annexure
III : LIST OF
PARTICIPANTS : List attached.
ANNEXURE
: I
TRAINING SESSION 4 HAND OUT :
MUTUAL
FUND CONCEPT & PRODUCT
Mutual Fund
is a trust in India, comes under Trust Act.
Regulator
for Mutual Funds in India is SEBI, The Security Exchange Board of India. Just
like IRDA to insurance and RBI to Banks.
There are
37 Mutual Funds in India. Indian and MNC companies. Total Assets Under
Management is Rs.8 lacs crore and above.
Mutual
funds are very liquid. You can invest any amount above Rs.1,000/- , no upper
limit, can withdraw when ever you want.
Unit Trust
of India was the first Mutual Fund in India. A Govt owned company.
Mutual fund
Industry was opened up for private players in year 1993. Morgan Stanley was the
first international fund,
Mutual Fund
offers the following benefits to the investor. You must use all these words
during your sales pitch with your customer.
- Liquidity.
- Transparency.
- Less risk.
- Diversification.
- Choice
- Flexibility
- Professional Management.
- Inflation beating return.
- Low cost of operations
- Well regulated.
In India,
there are 4 types of financial markets. (a) Equity / Stock Markets (b) Debt
Markets (govt & private) (c) Gilt markets ( govt only) (d) Money markets.
Each
customer’s risk profile differs, based on his /her past experience, net worth,
education level, and their priorities in life and financial goals. There is no
‘ One size fit all’ in MF s. We must do
proper risk profiling.
Our product
is called Peerless Income Plus Fund.
It invests
80% in Govt Securities ( Gilts) and 20% in equity markets. A Balanced Fund.
Our Funds
under management is Rs.4,200 crores. Our present NAV is Rs.10.48. It changes
every day. Posted on our web site.
Our
annualized returns are close to 12%.
ANNEXTURE : II
Photograph of the training session 4
ANNEXURE
: III . LIST OF PARTICIPANTS.
List of
participants.
|
Hyderabad
Branch
|
Peerless
General Finance
|
Serial Number
|
Agent
Name
|
Agent
Code Number
|
1 (
SESSION 1)
|
Md.Khairunnisa
Begum
|
191100505
|
2.
|
Bala
Narsimhaiah
|
191100573
|
3
|
Mr.Manda
Swamy
|
191100599
|
4.
|
Mrs.Amtati
Suryakala
|
19110026
|
5.
|
Mr.Govinda
Ram Ramesh
|
191100391
|
6.
|
Mr.Ch.Srinivas
|
19110425
|
7
|
Mr.Mothuku
Laxmaiah
|
191100602
|
8.
|
Mrs.M.Sharada
|
191100656
|
9.
|
Mr.Konka
Vijay Kumar
|
191100662
|
10.
|
Mr.Ch.Mallesh
|
191100698
|
11.
|
Mrs.Gattoori
Lakshmi
|
191100724
|
12.
|
Mr.Anugu
Sai Reddy
|
191100332
|
13.
|
Mr.Linga
Venkatesh
|
191100413
|
14.
|
Mr.Kemmasaram
Ramesh
|
191199374
|
15
|
Ms.V.Manjula
|
191100389
|
16.
|
Mr.Ch.Kanakaiah
|
191100422
|
17.
|
Mr.N.Bhasker
Reddy
|
191100624
|
18.
|
Mr.B.N.Suryaprakash
Raju
|
191100645
|
19.
|
Ms.Ambati
Sangeetha
|
191100703
|
20.
|
Mr.Kokkonda
Lakshmi
|
191100414
|
21.
|
Mr.Pilla
Venkatesh
|
191100421
|
22.
|
Ms.Kothakonda
Veena
|
191100536
|
23.
|
Mr.Sirisilla
Balakrishnaiah
|
191100648
|
24.
|
Mr.G.Aravind
Kumar
|
191100719
|
25.
|
Mrs.Andol
Lakshmi
|
191100719
|
26.
|
Mr.A.Mallesham
|
191100417
|
27.
|
Mr.Kothakonda
Rajeshwar
|
191100016
|
28.
|
Mr.Bejjanaboina
Kanakaya
|
191100598
|
29
|
Mr.Mudigonda
Ashok
|
191100714
|
30.
|
Mr.Perla
Naresh
|
191100720
|
31
|
Mr.Nagulapalli
Sivalingam
|
191100721
|
32
|
Mrs.B.Mamatha
|
191100054
|
33
|
Mr.A.Poshaiah
|
191100617
|
34
|
Mrs.B.Archana
|
191100619
|
35
|
Mr.M.Srinivas
|
191100709
|
TRAINING
SESSION 5.
Peerless
General Finance has been a Residuary Non Banking Finance Company ( RNBC ), with
presence all over India and selling saving & deposit products , which have fixed interest rates, through its
well spread agent network, to predominantly rural customers.
Now
they are into distribution of Life Insurance Products ( of Max Newyork Life)
and General Insurance Products ( of IFFCO-Tokio), besides, their own Mutual
Fund, the Peerless Income Plus Fund.
Goal
setting of business targets is tricky because, each line of business, has
different market size, different number of competitors in the fray and
different customer profile and different regulator ( SEBI & IRDA, for
instance). Taking up all over India
targets and breaking them up, region wise, and branch wise, had been done at
Head Office.
Organizational
Objective : At the
start of the financial year, we have business goals, for the entire company,
region and each branch of the company. Company objective in this program is to
make the sales supervisory staff to understand what their goals are : revenue
goals, profit goals, non-sales goals, assess the resources given to them, make
optimal utilization of resources and achieve and surpass the goals given.
Topic :
Goal setting. Having clear goals at the beginning of the financial year,
sharing with the team mates, assessing resources and helping the team achieve
their goals and in the process, achieve team goals, branch goals and
organizational goals in general.
Date. 10.May.2011.
Venue : Hyderabad
Participants
Background : 1 branch manager. 2 marketing officers. 2
assistant managers. 2 relationship executives. They comprise the sales
supervisory staff in the company. Only Relationship Executives are juniors,
with 25-30 year old age category. Others are all seniors. With the company for
more than 20 years. In 40-50 years old age category.
Totally
7 supervisory staff. Each of them are given a team of 6-7 agents, whose
business volumes, they are responsible for. Including branch manager.
Training Objective :
A branch has to achieve its profitability goals, to achieve
sustainability. Task of the supervisory staff is to achieve the goals, through
the team members. Training objective is to make the audience understand the
importance of goal setting, clarity, strategy to achieve etc. Sharing the same
with team members. Making them get
insight into the personal goals of each team members.
Learners Objective :
Sales supervisory staff, who are the target audience in this training
session, have their personal career objectives as well as their group/team
goals, and they need to achieve business goals of the organization. Their
objective is to understand the company goals, share them with the team members,
provide resources and support to team members, help them achieve their goals.
In the process, achieving personal career goals.
Content & Outline
: Every job has some key deliverables and
certain performance goals. But here in Networking marketing model, the
supervisory staff need to share their goals with their team members. Split
their goals into smaller parts and share with each member.
Setting,
short term ( within 1 month), medium term ( present Quarter & next Qurater)
and long term ( 1 financial year) goals to team members is imperative.
The
team leader, in the process, must understand his own goals. And learn how to
achieve them, with given resources.
They
also need to explain to their team members, on what basis, the goals have been
set. Explain, industry size, market potential in their own district, earning
opportunity, competition and how they are faring , etc. Goals must appear
justifiable and reasonable. Should not appear arbitrary. Besides, the team leader must understand the
personal financial goals of each team member, in short term and long term : and
link the business targets to their personal targets, to make them self driven
and self reliant. Those who set goals must also explain the financial rewards
to the team members who , in future , will attain these goals.
Thus
goal setting is a soft skill. It requires a lot of leadership skill, apart from
knowing and sharing hard facts. Getting
an agreement on set goals is also important, considering, team members are all
40-50 years age bracket.
Methodology :
Class room, instructor led training. 50% lecture methods. 2 case studies
. 1 on Life Insurance and 1 on General Insurance.
Audio Visuals :
Lap top and projector. Total module had some 30 power point slides. ( one sample is attached ) . A mike.
Vernacular Hand outs , at the end of the session.
Feedback and Reaction
Level Evaluation : Common rating : 4.2 on a 5 point scale
averaged. Some of the remarks.
- We
need a review of goals , at the end of one month.
- I
have personally learned about the important of having clearer goals in my
own life.
- My ‘
wish’ list’ now has matured into goals.
- I
will be more demanding on myself in attaining my goals.
Annexure I : HAND OUT OF THE SESSION : Enclosed.
Annexure II : PHOTOGRAPH OF THE TRAINING
SESSION : Has been enclosed.
Annexure III : PARTICIPANTS LIST : Enclosed.
ANNEXURE : I
SESSION
5 : HAND OUT : GOAL SETTING.
GOAL SETTING.
- Why
Goal Setting : It’s important, to manage our time
better and more optimally, in achieving organizational goals, for a better
future.
- What
Type of Goals : Goals should be SMART goals. Specific,
Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time bound.
- Organizational
Goals : Share with them, what the organization
wants to achieve, on macro, national level, in each business line. And our
contribution.
- Group
Goals : Share with the team members, the branch
goals.
- Team
Goals : There are 6 teams in each branch. Share
with them, the team goals, for each business line. That is, on Life
Insurance, General Insurance and Mutual Fund.
- Spend time with each team
member and find out what their personal goals in life are. Do not limit
yourself to financial goals only. There can be health goals, personal
development goals, religious / spiritual goals, family goals and many
non-financial goals. Such as more time for family etc.
- As a Team Leaders, try to align
, to the extent possible, a person’s goals , both financial and non
financial – to organization’s business goals. That way, you can create
more self driven people.
- Getting a buy-in is important
in goal-setting.
- Some people may want to change
their goals. Be flexible or explain why certain numbers are ‘ non
negotiable’.
- Explain the Peerless Career
path in the next 2&1/2 years. Give him/her a visualization of where
they would be , 2&1/2 years later.
- Explain them clearly, the
6-monthly promotion system ( in our MLM set up) that we introduced.
- Explain them the rewards that
await them, for each next level of promotion they attain. 5 promotions in
next 2&1/2 years.
- Explain them the exact
commission structure of each product, in personal business as well as the
Over Riding Commission (ORC) for getting business done through their team
members.
- Explain them the target to be
achieved, for getting Rs.10,000/- per month income for next 3 years.
- Explain them the Club Memberships
we offer and eligibility criteria for the same.
- Ensure they understood : recap
on promotion criteria, club membership criteria, commission structure and
over riding commission.
- Set target dates. Get
commissions. Ask what support they need. Offer support. Wish them well.
Monitor progress.
- ( A quiz follows : on Peerless
promotion structure, club memberships , foreign trips etc -- at the end of
the session)
ANNEXURE : II
- Photograph
of the session 5. Award distribution Ceremony
ANNEXURE : III
TRAINING
SESSION : 5.
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS.
- Mr.K.Sathya
Narayana Murthy, Branch Manager.
- Mr.Paresh
Nath Sinha, Asst.Manager.
- Mr.Karan
Kumar. Asst.Manager.
- Mr.Venu
Gopal , Marketing Officer.
- Mr.T.V.Raju,
Marketing Officer.
- Mr.Satish
Kumar, Relationship Executive.
- Mr.Mohan
Shankar, Relationship Executive.
CHAPTER 3
EVALUATION OF TRAINING
Concept
Training
Evaluation is important in assessing the effectiveness of the training program
in terms of learning and finally, in terms of its effect on the revenue and
profitability of the organization.
However,
we do not ( and cannot ) directly reach there ; estimating its effectiveness to
the organization in terms of revenues, growth and profitability. There are
steps involved. There are various models in vogue now.
There
are Bramler model , Kirkpatric Model followed internationally and
Promilla-Virmani model, more popular in India.
Evaluation
, while not difficult, is a very methodical process. Which involves a step by
step process. Training evaluation involves objectivity, which means, any person
who conducts it should reach same / similar conclusions. And reliability, which
means, even if the iterations are conducted a number of times, the results
should not vary. Not much at least. And
consistency. Same methods should be applied to different programs in an organization.
Objectives
Evaluation
of training is important, both for profit oriented corporations as well as for
non-profit organisastions.
Evaluation
is important because, Training incurs expense, although it should be treated as
‘ investment’ , it is expense nevertheless. Hence, it is important for both
for-profit and non-profit organization, to see, whether they are getting any
return on their investment , and to what extent.
All
functions in an organizations should be evaluated for their purpose,
efficiency, effectiveness and their overall effect on the organization’s
revenue or profit. Same goes with training.
An
organization exists, mainly, for 2 purposes. 1. To sell more of its products
and services. 2. To serve its customers, who bought its products or services.
That
way, Training function assumes importance in both the above cases. It’s
evaluation is important. Evaluation of sales training, process training and
customer service training , is important – to measure its effect on the overall
organization’s business ( or non-profit) objectives.
Importance
To
the promoters and top management. Conducting one training program or multiple
training sessions to various sets of participants ( employees) costs the
company. In terms of trainer’s fee ( if he /she is external faculty) or salary
( in case they are internal trainers), location and transport expenses ( if
conducted outside, away from workplace, which happens often), the opportunity
cost to productivity ( since employees / training recipients are away from the
work station during the training period), costs of equipment, room rent, lunch,
etc. Hence, Organization wants to know whether, the time and energy and money
spent – is translating into something valuable to the company. In terms of
higher revenues ( in case of sales / productivity trainings), profits ( process
trainings ), and higher good will and brand value to the company ( in case of
service trainings). And there ought to
be objective parameters to evaluate, so that, if any department or function
conducts an evaluation study, once or in repeated iterations, the results
should be the same or nearly same.
To
the Recipients : The employees or those who receive training. They may be new
employees or seniors at different level in the hierarchy or at a different
function. Each of them have some key deliverables and Key Result Areas ( KRI)
and Key Performance Indicators ( KPI s ) , based on which they are judged, at
the end of the year. Their career
growth, promotion and increments etc depend on what they deliver during the
assessment period.
Therefore,
the recipients of the Training want to know, whether, this training will be
helpful to them in achieving their career objectives and personal and
professional goals. If so, which way ?
And to what extent ? There must be parameters based on which, the AUDIENCE will
judge a training ession.
The Training
Department :
To get the training budget, to conduct the
training programs, to show, to top management and to recipients, and to all
other stake holders, the utility and effectiveness of Training programs. The
value of good training strategy to the organization. To prove the value of
Training and its effect on financial and non financial objectives of the
company. To show, that the money and time and human resources are well spent.
Evaluation
must be based on some common principles such as clarity, objectivity ,
reliability and replicability and feasibility.
Stages of
Evaluation :
Evaluation
does not start at the END of the training program. Real Training Evaluation
starts BEFORE the start of the training program ( weeks before, actually! ),
for comprehensive assessment. Different stages of Evaluation of Training are :
- Before
the training program. To set the objectives clear. To align the training
goals with the organization’s overall goals : financial and non financial.
- During
the training [program : To determine, whether we ( trainers & the
audience) are on the right track, or going astray from the previously
stated objectives. Midway course correction is the purpose.
- After
the training program. There are
many methods.
Models of
Evaluation :
There
are many proven, time tested and robust models of evaluation which are
portable, can be applied to different industries, various functions and to
various types of training. Main among them are :
Hamblin’s
Model.
Kirkpatrick’s
Design
Warr’s
Freamework
Virmani
& Premilla’s Model.
Peter
Bramley’s Model. David Reay’s approach.
All
the above models deal with various LEVELS of evaluations. We have mentioned about
stages. Apart from stages, there are many levels.
They
can be summed up as follows.
Levels of Evaluation:
Context
Level
Training
Input Level.
Reaction
Level
Learning
/ Knowledge Level
Job
Behaviour Level
Functioning
Level
Skill
Transfer Level
Results
Level
Overall
Effectiveness Level.
Some
of the above are different only in nomenclature.
Levels
can also be AT
- Organization
Level.
- Team
Level.
- Individual
Level.
Approaches to
Training Evaluation
:
There
are different approaches such as : Ultimate Value Approach, Trainee Centered
Approach, and Training Centered Approach.
Which
approach is the best ? Well, it depends on the context, industry etc and
sometimes, a combination of the above is better suited to the situation.
Training
Evaluation must be objective and there must be some mathematical / numerical
representation of the value.
There
are many Quantitative Approaches to measurement of Training outcomes. To name a
few :
Observation
( Oberserver’s diaries)
Interview
( for width and depth : closed ended & open ended)
Questionnaire
method
Rating
Scales method
Paper
and Pencil tests
Work
Sample Tests ( in case of production workers / computer programmers)
Simulation
Assessment
Centers
Individual
and Group Performance Measures
Individual
and Group Behaviour Measures ( behavioural training and services training)
After
the evaluation is over, and some numerical data is achieved, the evaluator must
link it to the Bottom Line results through cost benefit analysis.
Costs
While
measuring costs, one must consider, Fixed Costs, Variable Costs, Supportive
Costs, and Opportunity Costs (such as trainee’s day at the job)
Benefits
While
measuring the benefits : one must consider Direct Benefits ( possible in sales
training and process training and
production training etc), Indirect Benefits ( Services Training) and Long Term
Benefits ( Behavioural training and Leadership and Soft Skills training).
One
must consider the pitfalls in evaluations. Such as, it’s difficult to measure
managerial trainings. Most long term benefits are from managerial and
conceptual trainings. The higher the hierarchy , the more difficult it is to
measure.
During
this process, evaluation of individual training and entire training department
is also imperative.
All
evaluation methods and techniques must lend themselves to cross validation, to
bring in objectivity and reliability.
METHODOLOGY OF
EVALUATION OF A TRAINING PROGRAM
This
is the evaluation of one training program in our company, on Mutual Funds,
given to the sales and operations staff.
We
followed the following steps, and assessed 2 stages of Kirkpatric model.
Reaction level and Knowledge level and
also added ‘ skill’ level evaluation, when trainer accompanied the sales person
in the field. We followed the procedure as mentioned below.
1. Introduced
the concept of training evaluation, methods, reasons, objectives etc.
2. Before
the program, decided on what content to be taught.
3. Conducted
a pre training test to participants, and assessed existing knowledge level.
4. Made
modification on content and methods, based on existing knowledge levels.
5. Conducted
the training program.
6. Administered
the reaction level evaluation form, to know , how the participants FELT about
the program.
7. Administered
test to participants, after the training, and collated marks.
8. Using
the formula, assessed each participants’ and overall learning percentage, as a
result of this program.
9. Consolidated
the reaction level evaluation, based on 5-point rating scale.
10. Consolidated
knowledge level evaluation, based on marks.
11. Represented
both, in the form of graphs.
Details
of the Training Program for Evaluation
For
this evaluation, we had chosen the training program on Mutual Funds. The
context is that, our Organization is launching its own mutual funds for the
first time and all the staff had to be trained on the product and process.
For
this we have chosen our Hyderabad branch , which as 15 staff, belonging to
marketing and operation functions.
Name
of the Program : Mutual Fund Training.
Date
and Venue : 10.Aug.2011. At our Hyderabad branch.
Trainer
cum Facilitator : Myself, C.V.Ramana.
Duration
: 2 days, 4 sessions.
Methodology
employed : Instructor led training.
Whether
there were tests : There were both pre training and post training tests and
evaluation was done as per formula and methodologies.
REACTION QUESTIONNAIRE : POST
TRAINING EVALUATION
Instruction
: Please tick at the appropriate rating.
Rating 5. Excellent.
4. Very Good. 3. Good . 2. Average.
1. Poor.
How do you
rate the content of this training session ?
Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor
- Enjoyability of the training session
?
5 4 3 2 1
- Ability of the program to
achieve its objectives ?
5 4 3 2 1
- Ability of the program to help
YOU achieve your objectives ?
5 4 3 2 1
- Relevance of the content and
subject, to your area of work ?
5 4 3 2 1
- How was DURATION of the training ( PROGRAM) session ?
Adequate Not Adequate
6.
How
were the training ambience, food and facilities ?
5 4 3 2 1
- Improvement in the
understanding of the subject, as a result of this training program ?
5
4 3 2 1
9.
To what extent , your skills on the job improved, due to this training
session ?
5 4 3 2 1
Little somewhat much
- Your oveall rating of this
training session ?
5 4 3 2 1
ABOUT
THE TRAINER :
Instruction : Please
tick at the appropriate rating.
Rating 5. Excellent.
4. Very Good. 3. Good . 2. Average.
1. Poor.
Please
rate each trainer by placing his/her initials under the relevant score and for
each aspect,
- Knowledge of the subject
5 4 3 2 1
- His/her obvious Preparation
5
4 3 2 1
c. Organization of sessions
5 4 3 2 1
d.
Trainer’s style and delivery
5 4 3 2 1
e. Ability
to handle questions and clarify doubts
5 4 3 2 1
f.
Producing a good learning climate
5 4 3 2 1
Name of the
participant : Signature :
Date :
Findings of the
Reaction Level Evaluation ( Training Program)
PARAMETER
|
AV.RATING/5
|
Content
|
4.5
|
Enjoyability
|
4.3
|
Ability to achieve objectives
|
4.8
|
Ability to help participants
|
4.4
|
Content relevance
|
5
|
Duration
|
4
|
Training Ambience
|
4.2
|
Improvement in subject knowledge
|
4.3
|
Improvement in skills
|
4.1
|
Overall Rating
|
4.4
|
|
|
PARAMETER
|
5
|
knowledge of the subject
|
4.7
|
trainer's preperation
|
4.6
|
organisation of sessions
|
4.2
|
Training style & Delivery
|
4.5
|
Ablity to handle queries
|
4.8
|
Producting good learning climate
|
4.7
|
Overall rating of the trainer
|
4.5
|
Graphical
Representation of the Reaction Level Evaluation(Trainer)
REACTION
LEVEL RESPONSE : FINDINGS
Audience response on :
content / relevance / Timing / enjoyment / delivery / ambience. Immediate
responses.
Content : An overall rating of 4.5 . 10 people rated
content as ‘ Excellent. 3 as very good. Out of a total of 15. Bar Chart is enclosed.
Enjoying the session : 13 out of 16 participants said
they enjoyed the training fully. The rest, mostly. Overall rating : 4.3
Whether the program
has achieved its stated objectives ?
Average
rating : 4.8 , different participants have given different rating. All has been
consolidated and averaged out in the bar chart. On the program. On the trainer
as well.
Whether it has helped
the participants to achieve their objectives.:
90% agreed completely. Average rating on this parameter : 4.4
Content Relevance : Every body agreed it’s the mst
relevant. Av.Rating: 5.
Duration :
Adequate. Could have been split
into 2 sessions instead of cramming lot of information into one session.
Average Rating: 4.
Training Ambience : In the conference hall. They felt
good. Since it’s done in the same city they are posted ( Hyderabad) it helped
in preventing them into lapsing into ‘ holiday mood’, as generally happens when
conducted in outside location. Average rating : 4.2
LEARNING
/ KNOWLEDGE LEVEL EVALUATION
Learning Evaluation : It’s done in 2 stages. One, we
took their responses on ‘ Reaction Questionnaire’. Asked them to write ‘ 3 most
important and valuable things they learnt in the training session. To ‘
reinforce’ learning.
Immediately
after reaction questionnaire, we conducted a test. Candidates and their pre
test and post test marks are attached here with.
Also,
the reaction graph is attached. Formula for evaluation, that is
( post test score-pretest score) / (100-pre
test score ) X 100 has been applied to every participants and overall average
of the same , taken.
Test : Test was for 100 marks. Consisting
of 20 questions of varying weightage.
Earlier, we made a ‘ Question Bank’ with 1,000 questions and took 100 out of
it.
I
have attached a sample of 20 questions, for the purpose of our evaluation.
|
|
KNOWLEDGE EVALUATION
PRE
TEST & POST TEST QUESTION PAPER:
Instructions.
1.
Tick
the right answer.
2.
Each
question carries 5 marks.
Questions
: 20. Max.Marks
: 100.
1)
Offer document is issued by :
a)
Sponsor
b)
AMC
c)
Trustee
d)
AMC in the name of the Trust
2)
Initial expense of open-end fund can be
amortised for :
a)
10 yrs.
b)
15 yrs.
c)
Cannot be amortised
d)
5 yrs.
3)
Expenses in c/w printing of KIM can be
amortised for
a)
10 yrs.
b)
5 yrs.
c)
Cannot be amortised
d)
15 yrs.
4)
Offer document is required by MF
a)
as a SEBI requirement.
b)
As an investor’s requirement
c)
As a AMC requirement
d)
None of the above
5)
Rs.300 becomes Rs.600 in 8 years.
Annualised Rate of return (absolute) is
a)
10%
b)
12.5%
c)
Data insufficient
d)
None of the above
6)
NAV at the beginning 21/-, after 18
months NAV is 23/-. The annualised NAV is
a)
1.56
b)
9.52
c)
6.34
d)
none of the above
7)
Interest rate and Bond Fund are
related
a)
Inversely
b)
Proportional
c)
No relation
d)
Directly
8)
If a charitable religious trust
approaches you as a distributor
a)
Accept the application subject to the
scheme being an eligible instrument
b)
Refer the offer document
c)
Reject the application
d)
Accept the application as a direct
application
e)
None of the above.
9)
Application form is available with
a)
Offer document
b)
Abridged annual report
c)
KIM
d)
Bank Challan
10) In
case o an assured return scheme, MF Unitholder can sue
a)
AMC
b)
Sponsor
c)
Guarantor, who guarantees the return
d)
None of the above
11) The
minimum requirement for AMC is
a)
10 cr.
b)
10 cr. At all times
c)
30 cr.
d)
None of the above
12) SEBI
states that s security is to be considered as unquoted when
a)
Security is not traded in stock exchange
b)
Security is not traded for 30 days
c)
Security is not traded for 60 days
d)
None of the above
13) Trial
commission is justified in case of
a)
deferring the commission
b)
When an investor cancels his application
for investment
c)
Agent can voluntarily return the commission
for the cancelled application
d)
None of the above
14) Ex-mark
of 100% could be for a
a)
Growth Fund
b)
Aggressive growth fund
c)
Index Fund
d)
Sector Fund
e)
Balanced Fund
15) A high
P/E in consideration to average market multiple could be of
a)
Value Fund
b)
Growth Fund
c)
Balanced Fund
d)
None of the above
16) Which
of the following is true :
a)
Investment in rated debt not to exceed
15% of NAV
b)
Investment in unrated debt not to exceed
10% of NAV
c)
Total investment in all debt not to
exceed 25% of NAV
d)
All of the above
17) MMMF
is most likely to invest in
a)
Corporate Bonds
b)
Equity Shares
c)
G-Sec of maturity less than 1 year.
d)
Rated instrument
18) A
retired person with 25% equity risk and moderate risk appetite should invest
in
a)
Balanced Fund
b)
Value Fund
c)
Diversified Equity Fund
d)
Growth Fund
19) Which
of the following is not a criteria for sponsor
a)
Networth to be more than unit capital
b)
40% net worth should be of sponsor
c)
20% of assets should be invested by
sponsor
d)
None of the above.
20) A high
portfolio turnover ratio means
a)
The Fund is active
b)
Transaction cost is high
c)
High risk in investment objective
d)
All of the above
e)
Answers
to Question Bank :
1 B
|
2 C
|
3 C
|
4 C
|
5 C
|
6 B
|
7B
|
8 D
|
9C
|
10C
|
11. B
|
12.A
|
13.B
|
14.B
|
15.B
|
15.A
|
17.A
|
18.C
|
19.C
|
20.D
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
Findings of the
Knowledge Level Evaluation
Formula for Learning Index
=
( Post Test marks %age – pre test marks %age )
------------------------------------------------------------------ X
100
(100 – pre test
marks %age)
PRE
AND AND POST TRAINING TEST MARKS
AND
PERCENTAGE OF LEARNING
Pre- trng Post- Trng
NAMES
|
MARKS
/100
|
Marks/100
|
Percentage of Learning
|
Mr.K.S.N.Murthy, Branch
Manager.
|
35
|
91
|
86.1
|
Mr.Venu Gopal. Marketing
Officer.
|
46
|
84
|
70.3
|
Mr.Paresh Nath Sinha,
Asst.Manager.
|
15
|
55
|
47
|
Mr.Karan Kumar. Senior
Officer.
|
20
|
80
|
75
|
Mr.Satish Kumar. Sales
Officer.
|
23
|
76
|
68.8
|
Mr.P.V.Ramana. Staff (Service
& Admin)
|
36
|
66
|
46.8
|
Mrs.Krishna Sodary ( S & A
)
|
51
|
78
|
55.1
|
Mrs.Radha Rani ( S & A )
|
44
|
84
|
71.4
|
Mrs.Vijaya Laxmi Reddy ( S
& A )
|
53
|
82
|
61
|
Mr.Ambati yadayya. Senior
Organizer ( sales)
|
18
|
64
|
56
|
Mr.D.Ravindra ( S & A)
|
21
|
79
|
73.4
|
Mr.T.V.Raju. ( S & A )
|
14
|
62
|
55.8
|
Mr.D.S.N.Murthy. ( S & A)
|
28
|
69
|
56.9
|
Mr.Jagadeeswar Rao ( sales
officer)
|
35
|
74
|
60
|
Mr.Jagannadham . Branch
Accountant.
|
54
|
85
|
67.3
|
Mr.M.Bhasker Reddy. I.T &
admin.
|
26
|
77
|
68.9
|
Average
|
32.43
|
75
|
63.73
|
|
(516/16)
|
(1200/16)
|
(1019.8 / 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graphical
Presentation of pre-training and post-training marks
SKILLS
EVALUATION - POST TRAINING
We
can’t gauge improvement of skills unless they go into field and ACTUALLY SELL
mutual fund to a customer. But because of strong conceptual inputs, their
knowledge of financial instruments improved. As a result, their CONFIDENCE
levels in dealing with customer objections ( anticipated) – has improved.
Skills
improvement can be measured, only when we go to joint sales calls with the
audience , post training. For that, we have a tool, in our organization.
MPT,
The market Pulse Test:
We went to 5 joint sales calls with the supervisory staff, over a period of
one month AFTER TRAINING session. To measure the transfer of knowledge to the
field / workplace. In our
organization, we call it ‘ The Market Pulse Test.
I am attaching one such sample here, where we
need to go to the sales calls, let THEM make the call, intervene minimum,
resist the temptation to do the sales ourselves and observe. After each call,
we do some post sales analysis with the person, and some de-briefing, on what
went right and what could be better in next sales call. One such sample
report is enclosed here with.
This joint field
call, or ‘ Market
Pulse Test’ was done with our Hyderabad branch manager. We gave weightage to
12 important aspects of sales and measured the same on 10 point scale. In the
first call, the candidate scored 96 out of 120. It’s enclosed here with.
|
MARKET
PULSE TEST : JOINT SALES CALL : SKILL EVALUATION
|
Q- CARD
|
Peerless
General Finance. Market Pulse Test.
|
MR.K.S.N.MURTHY. Branch Manager, Hyderabad
|
Date: ___________________
|
27&28.September.2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
Joining:
03.Aug.2009
Date of last training
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skill
Sets
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Fair / Avg
|
Poor
|
|
|
10
|
6
|
3
|
1
|
|
Introduction
|
10
|
6
|
|
|
|
Opening
Statement
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Request
for permission to ask questions
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Probing
Skills to identify needs
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Presentation
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Objection
Handling Skills
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Personal
rapport with the customer
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Closing
skills
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Attitude
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Product
knowledege
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Competition
knowledge
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Reference
asking skills
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARKET
PULSE TEST GRAPHIC REPRESENATION OF SKILL ASSESSMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHAPTER 4
PREFACE TO CASE
STUDIES
I
have taken two topics as case studies :
1. A
problem where, Training is the solution ( Case Study 1 :” problem of choosing a
right guest trainer)
2. A
crucial problem where Training is NOT the solution but Training
Department’s inputs were needed to provide solution ( Case Study 1:“
selection of the right insurance agent)
Here
is how I have constructed the case studies .
1.Background
of the company and industry
2.Definition
of the problem, as seen my various stake holders from various angles and
perspectives.
3.
Various dilemma s and questions, on how to find a solution.
4.
Solution to the problem.
5.
How it was implemented , any problems and surprises faced.
6.
How they were resolved and
7
Conclusion.
CASE
STUDY 1
SELECTION OF THE RIGHT EXTERNAL TRAINERS AND CORRECT TRAINING
METHODOLOGY FOR RURAL PARTICIPANTS OF INSURANCE SECTOR
Background of the
Company : Jupiter Financial Services and Investment Company Ltd , has been in the
business of financial services ( Deposits
Products) since 1932.
The
company shifted its business line from selling deposit products to selling
insurance ( Life and General) and Mutual Funds.
To enable their agents to sell the new products and make them successful
in new line of business, the organization had hired Training professionals from
outside, belonging to the same / similar industry.
Branch Network and
Agent Network : Company has branches 180 all over India, in
district head quarters. Apart from
branches, it has well knit teams of agents in approximately 650 remote villages
or small towns, which are sometimes 100 Km to 150 km away from the main
branches, called ‘ Pockets’. Training had to be taken to these 700 remote
villages, or ‘ Pockets’.
Company
has nearly 20,000 agents all over India, spread across 180 branches, and living
in the above 650 ‘ Pockets’.
Training Department :The department is headed by the
D.G.M ( Learning Solutions) and 8 Regional Training Managers. Company has 12
Regions all over India and some regions don’t have RTM s and are handled
directly by DGM ( LS) and regional sales managers.
External ( Guest )
Trainers : To cater to the training needs of 160
branches and 700 ‘ pockets, company has hired external trainers, through man
power staffing companies. We give them a daily fee per training man day, and
reimburse their travelling, lodging and boarding expenses. Their fees vary as
per their age, experience in Training, Insurance related qualifications and
certifications etc. We have, nearly 100 external ( guest) trainers all over
India.
THE PROBLEM - RECEPTIVITY AND ACCEPTANCE OF EXTERNAL
TRAINERS ! :
We
conduct “ pocket” trainings. Initially ,
all over agents were very happy. There are 23 Life Insurance companies and 18
General insurance companies in India. Most of them MNC s. No other company in
India sent their Trainer to the remotest village to, impart Training to them,
to improve their knowledge. To enhance their skills. Of course, company has
done it for its benefit only but agents admired it, for the pain and trouble it
took. External trainers carrying their Laptops, Projectors, Post Training
Handouts, coming to their village to train them, was the sight they loved !
This
training honeymoon did not last long. Soon, expectations were not met and
disappointment crept in, among agents. It started to come to us , though Feed
back forms, in formal forms and informal
telephone conversations.
To
put in a nutshell, these are the problems, agents told us :
- They had difficulty in
understanding and following the subject. Subject is new , as the company
had forayed into Insurance business.
- External trainers, who were
training in MNC insurance companies, have not adapted to the Jupiter way
and to the rural participant. Too many English words in Training delivery,
which are lost on the learners. While they don’t doubt the knowledge of the trainers, they had difficulty in
following what they had to say.
- This is resulting in poor marks in post training tests,
to check the agents’ knowledge. Training delivery was deemed ineffective.
- Rural participants are mostly
under graduates. They are extremely INHIBITED and stage conscious, when
called on to the stage for a role-play or demonstration. The external
trainers do not even know the participants names and have no sense of
belonging to the company. They were
making no extra efforts to make
junior agents overcome their inhibitions and fears and come out openly .
They are just sticking to the modules & agneda and packing off later.
- External trainers are making no
efforts to CONNECT with the participants at a personal level. Our agents,
with their rural back ground and educational constraints, feel shy. They
are unable to get up and ask their doubts freely during the session. After
the trainer left, they are coming out with their pent up doubts with them
team leaders, who are not in a position to clarify. Team leaders
themselves could not understand trainers clearly !
- In case of a product doubt, say, 1 week
later, they can’t contact their trainer. He/ She is not leaving their
phone numbers with us.
- Some senior agents feel that
they notice a lack of respect when the trainer from town addresses them in
Singular ‘you’ ( Tum) , rather than
plural’ you’ ( aap).
- Results of all the above have
been – training programs have not been meeting the objectives ! People’s
learning is hampered, and transfer of learning to the field is not
happening. Result : Sales ( which is the ultimate objectives) are not
growing as per budgets.
QUESTIONS FOR
DISCUSSION :
- As a Training Head, what do you
feel is the crux of the problem ? How would you start the remedial measures
?
- What changes would you make ,
in the content, Powerpoint Modules, and post training hand outs, to make
them comprehensible to the participants ?
- What training would you give to
the External Trainers, so that, they can function and deliver trainings in
the Rural Markets better ?
- How would you test the external
trainers and identify the lacunae and give corrective inputs ?
- What corrective inputs would
you give them in Training Methodology and delivery methods, in the rural
markets ?
- These external trainers are not
your paid employees and hence ‘ command and control’ talk will not work.
They can choose another company to work for. What’s your approach , in
taking them into confidence and pointing out the problem ?
- What tough decisions would you
take, if the remedial measures are not working and corrective inputs are
not being absorbed by some trainers ?
- What would be the ideal post
training follow up , to measure its effectiveness ?
- How would you measure the
effectiveness of your remedial
interventions ? That is, training in rural areas by guest trainers, post
the remedial action ?
- What measures would you
undertake, to change the attitude of external trainers, to make them adapt
a more helpful attitude towards the rural participants ?
SOLUTIONS TO THE QUESTIONS
- A. Cultural
Sensitivity : The Crux of the
problem is lack of ‘ cultural sensitization’ of external trainers through
good induction training. But the remedy doesn’t start there. It has to
start at far more basic level. B :
Right Selection process : The real remedy must start with SELECTION
process. So far, we interviewed the external trainers in a Video
Conference in Reliance Web World, checked their qualifications and
knowledge and training experience and took them on board. We didn’t meet him/
her in person. Here after, before
selection, we would send them to a rural area for mock presentation ( for
an hour) , travelling charges paid by us, and have our staff, rate the
trainer. Or, we should have called
them to our office and asked Trainers will satisfactory rating and (or)
with potential for adaptation, will be taken.
C.
Inclusive , de-centralized decision
making : Not having involved our branch managers and staff in the selection
process of an external trainer, was a mistake. For instance, Head of training,
sitting in Kolkotta, cannot judge a Kerala trainer, how good is he at Malayalam
and whether his audience is able to understand him ! Or for that matter, how
good his Gujarathi / Tamil is – if the Trainer is taken for Tamil Nadu or Gujarat
!
Centalized
decision making and not involving the
local Branch Managers ( for whose benefit and whose help, these trainers are
hired ! ), is a MISTAKE and we started our remedial action with US. Correcting OUR
MISTAKES first, before correcting the mistakes of our External Trainers.
- Changes
in the content & modules : We will hire external content
developers and convert ALL our PPT s and post training hand outs into
Vernalcular languages. Bengali, 4 south Indian languages, Hindi, Gujarati
and Marathi, where we are strong.
Once the content developer finishes
the job, we sent the modules to local
branches for VALIDATION. For, sometimes use textual / prosaic languages,
instead of colloquial language and words. Booksih word text gets lost on the participants.
Words from local dialects should be preferred.
- Culturally
sensitizing External Trainers
: We hired a trainer from NIS Sparta, Mr.Sanjay
Talukdar, who is such a seasoned professional in rural market
trainings ! He worked for many NGO s and trained rural participants. A one
day training program from him, gave valuable inputs to our 100 external
trainers, great insights ! \
- Evaluating
the external trainer & methods employed : We made each external trainer
, give presentation in our BRANCHES, to the STAFF respectively, in
VERNACULAR language only, and took their feed back and inputs, apart from
the feed back we already have, from our agents, during their past training
programs. We collated them and gave inputs to each External Trainer,
personally. Not publicly during
meetings ! Lot of unpleasant feed back had to be given and we thought,
it’s best when it’s personal and confidential and within the 4 walls !
- Right
Training Methodology for rural markets : During one day Train the Trainer in rural
markets, they were taught the importance of eye contact, finding right
vernacular words, talking slowly, re capturing frequently, rewarding
active participants etc. From participants point of view, we suggested our
agents to wear NAME BADGES so that, the external trainers, when ever
required, will call them by name.. instead of impersonal ‘ will you please
get up’ ?
- Counseling
external trainers :
Best way to give constructive feedback is to give in person. With
objectivity. Documentary back up & feed back forms. Telling them their
positive points first. Areas of improvement next. And the BENEFITS of
improving and closing up with positives. In a nutshell, a ‘ burger’ approach to giving constructive
feed back. 2 Buns with curry in the middle.
- Some
tough decisions :
Not all trainers are open to this feed back. Some have no NEED for it.
They are in demand elsewhere and feel they don’t need to make these
changes. Some have real attitude problem. If there is no change in
training delivery in the face of
feed back and even after counseling, it’s best not to hire them
again. Since they are not on pay roll, process is easy too. No need of
resignation letters, relieving orders etc.
- Ideal
Post Training Follow up :
The concerned branch managers, sales & marketing staff and team
leaders are the best ones to do this. External Trainer goes to another
branch or company. Where is branch staff are always available. The
concerned trainer is advised to contact these, with questionnaires and
formats as post training feed back, 15 days after the session. About how
they felt, the learning transfer, about problems encountered in the
transfer of learning, changes needed in trainings, problems in
comprehension etc. Regional
Training Managers are instructed to collect this post training feed back.
- Measuring
the effectiveness of remedial
interventions : Proof of the
pudding lies in its eating. Effectiveness is measured in feed back. This
is principally the reaction feed back and the knowledge evaluation. If the
participants FEEL GOOD about the training and also UNDERSTAND the subject
matter, more than half the battle is won. For knowledge transfer, Branch
marketing officials are there to take care of that.
- Bringing
attitude change, in external trainers : In case of some external trainers ( especially
the young), feed back of 1 training session and counseling may not be
sufficient. To some people, we need to give time and continuous feed back
, for at least 3 training sessions, to adapt ( not ‘ correct’) themselves
to our situation. For some trainers, one session & feed back is
sufficient. For some, we need to give them time and multiple sessions and
feed backs. In these cases, patience pays. These people , who showed willingness,
were given longer rope and they adapted and evolved , over a period of
time, which was not very long.
CONCLUSION : All is well that ends well. All
these initiatives, putforth collectively by the training department and a team
of Regional Trainers ( with inputs from sales people, Branch Heads and
Marketing staff ) started showing
results , slowly , but surely. Some of these
external trainers were simply not willing to adapt and not receptive to
frank feed back and not willing to make changes. Some, while nodded their head
and promised to make changes in their training delivery, but went on to repeat
the same mistakes ! Our feed back loop informed us of this. We had to terminate
service agreement with them and rope in new guest trainers. Now, our company
has a half yearly ‘ Train The Trainer Program’ to iron out any content /
delivery related issues or inter personal issues that arise with external
trainers.
While
the others who responded positively to these initiatives, are still with our
system for the past 2 years and are now an inseparable part of our training
initiatives !
CASE STUDY - II
PROBLEM OF SELECTION OF RIGHT INSURANCE
AGENT
Insurance Market Size
in India : In the year
finished on December 2010, Life Insurance companies collectively logged in a
First Year Premium of Rs.2,63,000 crores ! This is 23% higher than last years,
which was Rs.2,20,000 crores ! This industry has been growing at a pace of 25%
to 40% per annum, for the past 10 years, since it’s been liberalized.
To
get even a small piece of this huge market segment ( 3 th biggest in the world
! ),
Why Right Selection of
agent is important ?
Because,
he/she is the person who actually meets the customer and sells a policy. The
rest of all departments in a company are support services only ! Facilitating
the agent to sell.
Second,
in India, people BUY THE PERSON FIRST. And then the policy. Hence, companies
always formulate different procedures, honed by trial and error, for right
selection.
Number of Agents in
India : There are
29 lacs certified insurance agents in India, according to Industry
Regulator IRDA ( Insurance Regulatory
and Development Authority), as of December 2010
CUSTOMER’S PERSPECTIVE
:
Insurance
policy being an intangible product, insurance being basically a promise ! It’s
important for the companies to find out, what kind of an agent , the customer
prefers to buy from , and what kind of agents, they tend to avoid !
MODUS OPERANDI OF
RECRUITING AGENTS AND ACTIVATING
In
year 2009-2010 financial year, company has recruited, through their senior
agents, some 2,000 new agents, from April 2009 to September 2009. Recruitment
freezes after September because, in the next 6 months, we must train them,
coach them, take them to the field and make them successful in selling so that,
company gets business and profit and the agents, their commission and
livelihood. That’s broadly, company strategy.
Legal / Regulatory
Qualificaiton : Agents, can be male or female. Must be above
18 years old. Must have passed a 10+2 qualifications. Must have been trained
and certified. The regulator, the IRDA ( Insurance Regulator and Development
Authority) says that much and no more. Additional qualifications and filtering
criteria, are devised by companies.
There
are 23 Life Insuance Companies in India and 18 General Insurance Companies and
29 lac s of certified insurance agents.
Problem :
In Financial year 2009-10 ( 01.April.2009 to 31.March.2010), company had
recruited more than 2,000 agents. At the end of the financial year, more than
1,000 became inactive. Either they were terminated due to lack of business or
they opted out of insurance business, themselves, citing personal reasons.
An
Insurance agency is not a job. It’s a free lance business activity. They are
not paid employees.
Industry Attrition
Rate : Around 30% to 40% , depending on the company.
Our attrition rate is more than 50%. Alarmingly
higher than Industry average.
We
can’t afford this and we need to reduce this, because of costs involved in
recruiting them, training them, giving them books and reading material and time
and money spent in training programs to the new agents. We needed to minimize
the attrition.
BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO
THE ORGANIZATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The
same problems are also rife in Jupiter Financial Services and Investment
Company Limited, which, since 1932, has been involved in marketing savings and
deposit products, through a wide spread network of agents situated all over the
country, predominantly ( 70%) in rural areas. Thus, 70% of the business to the
company accrues from rural areas.
Company
recruits agents under Multi Level Marketing System, under which, a promoted
agent recruits his team members under him/ her. Apart from commission from
personal business, this senior agent also gets an Over Riding Commission (ORC)
from the juniors who get business.
Points to ponder ,
Questions to consider
: Company has approximately 22,000 agents ( at all levels of MLM) all over
India.
Jupiter
Financial Services has been suffering from a problem of high agent attrition.
2,000 agents were recruited last year,
and more than a 1,000 dropped out of business ! More than 50% attrition hurts
the finances of the company very badly. This brings us to the following
questions …
1.Who
is a good insurance agent ?
2.Whom
to select and whom to reject, during recruiting ?
3.What
are the qualities of a good insurance agent ? How to identify those qualities ?
4.What
are the qualities of a bad insurance agent ? How to identify those ?
These
are the questions, 23 Life Insurance Companies, and 18 General Insurance
companies, are breaking their heads with ! There are heated discussions in the
meeting rooms, conference halls, where business heads and functional heads are
having constant discussions and arguments : wresting with questions, and with
people, so to speak ! And this question
is VERY IMPORTANT, to the revenue and growth of an insurance company. Size of
the market is too big to ignore.
Compnay’s Dilemma : Members of our top management had a divided
opinion on employing a strict filtering criteria on who comes in.
INDUSTRY
TRENDS
Conservative Approach
: Some companies, like Max Newyork Life , Aviva
and MetLife, HDFC Standard Life, are METHODICAL in their selection process.
They have fewer agents and less reach in India. These companies are NOT market
leaders. But their agents produce more business and better quality business (
least lapse rate). Their paid up capital is lower and return on investment is
better. Conservative in their approach.
Aggressive Approach : Some companies, like ICICI Prudential ( Ranked
No.1), Bajaj Allianz Life ( Ranked No.3, after I-Pru & SBI Life), and
Reliance Life ( No.4) are aggressive. They have broader parameters, more
branches all over India and recruit aggressively. Their agents attrition rate
is more. They are aware of it and factored that in. The follow a ‘FUNNEL’
approach, where, the best people remain in the funnel, after inevitable
attrition happens. Their paid up capital is more and ROI is less. They are
aware of it. Their aim is market share.
Jupiter
Financial Services, can’t afford this approach. For, ours is not a principal
company, but a distributor company. Second, we don’t have an MNC parent
company, to inject fresh capital frequently.
Dilemma No.1 :Whether to adopt a conservative
approach or aggressive or a blend of both ? If so, what kind of blend should it
be ?
Dilemma No.2 : Standardize or customize ?
What
type of agent to recruit and whom to drop ? A standard formula was advanced.
This was not accepted by some top managers. For a company like Jupiter , which
as branches all over India , local and societal factors should be considered. A
formula which works in Bihar, or Kolkota, will not work in Kerala or Gujarat or
Himachal Pradesh – is their contention.
But
since company has been in business since 1932, it has a COMMON CULTURE and
heritage, unlike recent upstart MNC insurance companies, others contended. We
shouldn’t ape the newcomers, we must preserve the common culture, contended
others who recommended a standardized selection procedure !
A
third segment forwarded a compromise formula. Have some broadly defined common
selection criteria, within which, give
freedom or leeway to local branch managers to select or reject a
candidate.
s
Training
Department in Jupiter Financial Services ( headed by Chief Manager –Corporate
Training and 5 Regional Training Managers) was given this task - a
strategically important task – to develop a common selection criteria.
Why Training
Department ? :
Unlike others in Top management,who have been working with Jupiter for more
than 25 years, and are not aware of the processes outside their company, Training Head and Regional Trainers are hired
from outside. All of us come from different Life Insurance / General Insurance
companies and were exposed to different company procedures and processes. Thus,
Training Department’s portable skills
and knowledge, and collective exposure, comes in handy, in developing a
selection template.
ISSUES TO BE DISCUSSED
IN THE GROUP :
- Now, if you were the training
department head, what kind of selection criteria will you develop ?
- Would you go for an aggressive
approach or conservative approach , given the training budget ?
- Would you go for standardized
formula or localized and customized formula , different for each Region ?
- What basic minimum
qualification would you set as standard ?
- How much percentage of women
agents would you recommend ? Do you think it’s necessary ?
- What other eligibility criteria
would you evolve ?
- What should be done, to reduce
the attrition rate to 30% ?
Among
them, more than 18 lacs agents are ‘ inactive’. Either surrendered agency, or
terminated by company or not doing business at all.
Having
recruited them and spent a lot of money on training and certifying them, their
inactivity is HUGE LOSS to insurance companies, who have been expanding their
paid up capital base and not getting enough profits.
So,
selection is right agent is extremely vital to the survival, viability and
growth on an insurance company.
How to solve this
problem ?
DISCUSSIONS OF THE ISSUES &
SOLUTIONS PROPOSED
Answer no.1
We
at the Training Department of Jupiter, developed a ‘ 10 point formula’ as a
criterion for selecting agents. And suggested the sales department, to take any
person who satisfied AT LEAST 5 POINTS or above, out of the 10 criteria. We
showed the same to the Head of Sales and the top management ( President &
Vice President of Company) for consent and buy-in : and got it. Here are the 10
points.
- If the person is above 30
years, give 1 point. ( maturity & experience).
- If the person is married, man
or woman, give 1 point. ( Responsibility).
- If the person is having children, give 1 point.
( Need for money : monthly fixed expenses that grow in near future ; they
stick to the company for long).
- If he/she is a graduate, give 1 point (
understanding complex products and ability to present them).
- If the person has at least 1
insurance policy on himself or herself, give 1 point ( belief in
insurance).
- If the person is living in the
same town , at least for the past 3 years, give 1 point. ( local contacts)
- If the person is living in the
same AREA for the past 3 years at least, give 1 point. (again, local
contacts : which help in selling insurance).
- If the person has tasted at
least ONE SUCCESS in life ( and is able to tell us), give 1 point. ( If a
person has tasted success in the past, he/she does not want to fail in
this new venture.)
- If the person has faced any
SETBACK in life, give 1 point. ( People
who faced and survived setbacks in the past, are more likely to
survive in our competitive environment).
- Working in the same profession for the
past 3 years, give 1 point. ( stability).
Among
the above parameters, if the person scores at least 5/10 points, take him / her
as agent. If the person scores 4 or below, drop him / her.
This
has been hugely appreciated by our top management and Head of Sales.
We
rolled out a ‘ Recruitment Workshop’ for our team leaders and conducted this
program all over India.
This
has reduced our attrition to 27% and
now this is the template we have even now in practice !
Answer 2 :
Aggressive versus conservative
approach.
We
need to have a blend of cautious and a measured aggressive approach, given the
opportunities of Indian insurance market and regulatory aspects and basic
integrity required of an insurance agent. For, he /she is the one who collects
money from customer directly.
Answer 3. Standardized
versus customized approach
: Standards are broadly defined. Such as
age range, minimum education etc. Within these, some customization , which
makes space for local social factors, is provided. For instance, we developed 10
criteria, but anyone who meets 5 parameters , can be taken. This gives freedom
to the local branch managers to select or reject. For instance, in rural areas,
every prospective agent may not be a graduate, for may meet other criteria. Or
a person may meet all other criteria, but may not married with children.
Answer 4. Basic
Minimum Qualification : While graduation is preferred , 10+2 was made
a required minimum. Considering, Jupiter Financial services is traditionally
strong in rural markets.
Answer 5. Percentage of female agents : : Ideally 30% female agents are
preferred, because that segment is untapped. But success remains to be seen,
because in our country, women
traditionally do not take to sales profession easily. There is a cultural
aspect. We needed to advertise the success stories of existing female agents.
It’s necessary because, a field force should represent all sections of society.
Answer 6.Other
Eligibility Criteria : Preferable, but not essential are : a
person’s involvement in other social, cultural activities, club memberships,
and involvement in recreational activities like sports, singing etc. Because
these give a person, additional exposure to different social segments.
Answer 7 : To reduce
attrition : Right selection is only half the job !
Retention is a different challenge. To increase retention, the organization and
leadership should focus on right induction training, right grooming, support to
the agent and good coaching and mentoring. A right training design, methodology,
and implementation is helpful. So is immediate supervisor. On field support, is equally important.