Monday, February 02, 2026

From Ajith Kamath session on Design thinking

 Room No 4 . Break out . 


Divergence & Convergence . And their importance. 

Tita , Indonaesia : At the state of divergence, people create idea . It's not the amount of talking but DIVERSITY of it. More people speaking and not just volume. 

Monica Sharma ; In the context of facilitation , when you throw open gathering , expansive thinking is possible, along with contradictions . 

Converging : You do a fine tuning of the lot . 

Throwing open the funnel. 

CVR : Divergence is ideation . Deep democracy . Convergence : Action . Actionable ideas. Execution . 

Amy Chen from Taiwan : Facilitators are neutral to the situation . Hold space. Pay attention to the participants. Stay neutral. 

Fair opportunity to all participants. 

Labels:

Facilitation Week session on right questions , the power of ...

 First Question , session opener . What made you sign up and join the session today  ? 

Questions affect paradigm shifts . Mind loves compelling questions . Put a question on a big piece of paper and put on space ? So that it would start working on you ? 

Get over transactional questions . Transformational questions are different . Questions should stimulate creativity . They must challenge underlying assumptions . Where do you find the right questions ? 

What is mine to do ? Your ' No ' is yes to something else . So, don't be afraid of closing the doors . 

Sometimes some questions do not work. Because, the scope is in the wrong place . Either the scope is too big or too small . 

( 1) Assumption (2) Construction and (3) Scope ! Touche !

What is one question that really matters to you right now ? 

Nancy Bragard 18:11
What becomes possible for me when I have quieted down my mind to give more space to my heart and soul?

 How can I crack open conflicted silence among members of my congregation?

How can I crack open conflicted silence among members of my congregation?

How might I create a healthy boundaries to be happier?

How can I better offer my gifts to the world?

How do I know whether my question is right or wrong? Any guide to acknowledge ?

A question I have found very helpful, both for myself and others, is:

"In saying/doing/asking what one is saying/doing/asking, what is one really saying/doing/asking?”

How might I towards the sweet point between learn, earn and contribute? 

What becomes possible for me when I have quieted down my mind to give more space to my heart and soul?

how might I be able to create real impact through my work

3 breaks out rooms, with only 2 participants, pair up activities. With only one question . 

What is one question you are most absorbed in - right now ? 


Roll Dice  ( Flow Game Dice ) 

https://flowgame.net/dice/

WEST: It is the rest between the notes that makes the music. Where do you need to pause? (Green)

NORTH: What is your unique leadership? Ask the others for their intuition. (red)

Break out room questions . 

What are you able to hear , what is nature whispering to you ? 

Labels:

Memorable Training Session I attended . Fac Week 2026 Feb Blog

 

A GREAT FACILITATION SESSION I ATTENDED ( MARCH 2006 . AS A PARTICIPANT )

 

I won’t say ‘ the best ‘ because , it would invite unnecessary comparisons , within myself . I happed way back in March 2026 , in my first job as a Branch Training Manager ( BTM ) in Bajaj Capital , a BFSI company ! At that time, most of us haven’t heard of the word ‘ facilitation ‘ !

Conducted by our RTM, our reporting manager , who asked me to keep his name, confidential !

THE FACILITATOR :

We didn’t know much about him at that time, except that he did his MBA-HR in England and worked in Prudential Insurance for a few years. It was the sponsors of the first 60 over cricket world cup that India won in 1983 !

THE CONTEXT :  It was a new , upstart , national level BFSI company . With nearly 50 branches in the state of combined Andra Pradesh . They started recruiting Branch Training Managers a couple of years ago for each branch.

Now, we are a team of 30 BTM s reporting to our Regional Training Manger functionally and to the Area Sales Managers, administratively . In a Matrix form of dual reporting system.

THE PROBLEM :  Training department and all of us were a legal compliance focused and due to sales pressures, sales managers were all results focused, and this creating a daily functional frictions .  Also, equally important, how to reduce attrition rate in the sales department and what’s our contribution towards the same.

To reduce that and to improve mutual understanding between the Sales Department and the Training Department, our RTM called for a meeting in Hyderabad. That was the meeting objective . In March 2006 . Exactly 20 years ago .

THE TEAM : Back in 2006, almost none of us 30 BTMS had any formal training qualification !  One third of us are like me, coming from sales back ground to sales training . Others are from academia , like Economics & Commerce lecturers, some from BFSI ( Banking , Financial Services, Insurance ) industry experience in other functions .  

For us , training meant slide delivery , new product launch training , sales training etc. None of us ever heard the word “ Facilitation “ . Yet, when I look back after 20 years, this is one of the great facilitated sessions by our Manager, the RTM.

DURATION : It was a 2 days session .

 

PRE SESSION PREPARATION :  He sent an official mail to all of us. He set the context, stated the problem . The friction between Sales Managers and Training Manger in the branch and asked us to come with 3 specific Branch Related issues, apart from general issues.  He also asked us to come with possible solutions to the problems , within our company rules and norms . Since we are 30 in numbers, each Trainer gets no more than 5 minutes to 10 minutes to present our cases.

 

THE SESSION : All this back ground details I had to provide to give my readers , who are facilitators, with the CONTEXT at that time.

Our RTM set the context on day 1 , set the agenda and requested all of us not to interrupt any speaker, whether we agree or not. There was a time keeper, who will ring first bell at 5 minutes and second at 7 minutes and CLAP after 10 th minute !

He was accompanied by our Regional Training Coordinator, who came with his laptop and fiercely typing away points.

At the end of each presentation , we handed over the written paper, with a few points , to our Training Coordinator.

Our RTM was watching.  As our friend Vinisha Jayaswal used to say , ‘ he was present but it was an invisible presence ‘ .    If any one entered the meeting room, no one would notice him running the show ! He was sitting , not on the stage but among participants, in a remote, invisible corner.

Only occasionally and gently correcting the presenters when we went off the track or asking us to maintain silence – if the side talk decibel levels increased a threshold level !

 

On day 1, he spoke only for 10 minutes , summing up the session, taking questions and providing some spot solutions and ending on time ( NOW when I look at it , adhering to our SOT 4 formula ! ) with a tea and chat.

 

SESSION DAY 2  :

We didn’t know these words but this was the day of convergence . Our Coordinator has collated all the ideas from 30 of us, all coming to 85 to 90 . Some being the same.

Our RTM gave us one copy to each one of us , which has these 90 ideas . We need to READ all of them  . That was the first round. Now when I look back 20 years ago, it looks like a Textra game.

Then, he divided us into 7 groups of 4 each. Gave us 10 ideas each . We need build a consensus and select top 3 ideas from the same.

Each team has to present, (a) why they are the best as per our company policies and rules (b) if implemented , the possible effect on the individual , team and the company.  5 minutes each.

Top 20 ideas were selected. Now we understand, this is the convergence process ! At that time , we didn’t know . Back in 2006.

Post lunch second day , since none of us were formally trained to be trainers, he gave us a Training session !

On basic Adult Learning Principles or andragogy , principles from Malcolm Knowles, Blooms Taxonomy . Also demonstrated, how they look like when weaved into every day training .

And took practice sessions from 2 or 3 of us.

Session End reflection . He certainly corrected some of us during and after presentation , on body language, eye contact , choice of words etc. When required.

When I look back with the knowledge I have gained on facilitation thanks to IAF , this ranks as one of the memorable, unforgettable facilitated session I have ever attended. That’s why , it’s finding a mention after 20 long years !

It has the following , as I see it now :

(1)  Divergence. Idea generation . Brain storming . Problem statement .

(2)  Valuing every voice and idea . Deep Democracy principles. No one was more equal than others or less.

(3)  Convergence and the basis for it.

(4)  Action planning. We didn’t know but there was a bit of ORID in all that.

(5)  Psychological Safety . We were all new to the company and to the training profession . For ALL of us, it was our first training job . But we enjoyed it ! Many of us still remember it. I am in touch with a few colleagues even now !

(6)  It had group wisdom harvesting

(7)  The session was refreshingly free of  jargon . Had our boss used any Technical Lingo or jargon , we would have felt the apprehension that, this Training function and profession , was too difficult for us to handle.

This, as a participant . This was my first in training profession . There is another I can say , a great one, is the latest I attended in Bangalore. But more of it later ! 

No Photos are available . We all had ‘ feature ‘ phones in 2006.

I thank IAF for allowing me to share this !

C V RAMANA . IAF Hyderabad Hub , India Chapter .

Membership Number ; 38625

 

 

Labels:

Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Nimble Facilitation by Rebecca Sutherns 10 Sept 2025

 how will the insights from this workshop will be used and carried forward. 


Shivani Suri : What is that we are going to change ? Are there any unstated outcomes ? Risks , opportunities , which have not been brought out ? 

Who needs to be in the room ? What style of internvention will work with the group ? 

Understand if there are any group dynamics and other levels of influence ? 


Vibhu Dewan : 


Screensnot f questions taken . Plenary . 


Break out room No 2 . 5 minutes. Now, answers. One day workshop . In person. First of the several . You have been asked to be the overall process designer . Go and actually develop a session plan. You are sitting collaborators . Your go to design .

Where do you start the design . 

Workshop design : SWOT Analysis . SCOT - Challenges . 4D model of appreciate enquiry . What is working well for them. Dream ? 

Madhujit : A little bit of warming up . Check in . 

Start with SCOT & continue with 4D . 


Rebecca : What if you are a detail oriented and scripted person and being facilitated by a person who is spontaneous ? What's your reaction ? And vice versa ? Mix and match . And be very self aware . Your preference is not everybody's preferences . 

I am type 1 and my audience is type 2 , how can I leverage that diversity in a positive way ? 

I am a scripted person, I will be hyper scripted , under pressure. 

Parineeta : I am meeting a client for the first time and we don't know whether the client is scripted or spontaneous person ? 

Be aware of your bodily resoses. 

Rebecca : Be a nimble facilitator , have self awareness. Have some sort of tool you go to , while planning. 

Session Lab . Have a go to tool for planning . 

*



















Break out room No 3 :  What is your client is very different from you ? 

What is the cofac has a different tolerance to details ? Contracting with the cofac at the very outset ? 

Why we have to be nimble in facilitation ? Beccause your cofac or client has a different style than you .  You are detailed and they are spontaneous and vice versa . Hence , be nimble. 

What LOGISTICAL questions do you ask your client , before your session ? 


How likely is it we get consistently same peopple in a series of session ? And what if we don't ? What do we do ? 

What do you do, if your beloved method doesn't work ? 


Labels:

Sunday, May 04, 2025

Grok , session design , Stake holder management - SCSC , ken wilbur model

 Good evening from India! I'm thrilled to help you design a 90-minute to 2-hour workshop on Stakeholder Management for NGO employees, using Ken Wilber’s Integral Model (All-Quadrant, All-Levels framework). The Integral Model is a holistic framework that considers four quadrants: Interior-Individual (I), Exterior-Individual (It), Interior-Collective (We), and Exterior-Collective (Its). This approach will ensure the workshop addresses the personal, behavioral, cultural, and systemic aspects of stakeholder management, tailored to the NGO’s context (fundraising, donor relations, vendor management, expense control, social media management).

Workshop Objectives
By the end of the session, participants will:
  1. Understand stakeholder management through the lens of the Integral Model.
  2. Develop skills to identify, prioritize, and engage stakeholders effectively.
  3. Enhance interpersonal and systemic strategies for collaboration with donors, vendors, and internal teams.
  4. Apply practical tools and frameworks to their NGO’s stakeholder management challenges.
Session Design (90-120 Minutes)
The workshop is structured to balance theory, reflection, group activities, and practical application, ensuring engagement and relevance for NGO employees. Activities are designed to be interactive, inclusive, and aligned with the Integral Model’s quadrants.

Workshop Flow
1. Opening and Introduction (10 minutes)
  • Objective: Set the tone, clarify objectives, and introduce the Integral Model.
  • Facilitator Actions:
    • Welcome participants and briefly introduce yourself.
    • Outline the workshop objectives and agenda.
    • Introduce Ken Wilber’s Integral Model briefly:
      • I (Interior-Individual): Personal values, emotions, and intentions in stakeholder interactions.
      • It (Exterior-Individual): Observable behaviors, skills, and actions in managing stakeholders.
      • We (Interior-Collective): Shared values, culture, and relationships within and across stakeholder groups.
      • Its (Exterior-Collective): Systems, processes, and structures (e.g., donor databases, vendor contracts).
    • Use a simple visual (e.g., a quadrant diagram on a whiteboard or slide) to illustrate the model.
  • Activity: Icebreaker – Stakeholder Web (5 minutes)
    • Ask participants to stand in a circle. Hand a ball of yarn to one participant, who shares their name, role, and one stakeholder they interact with (e.g., “I’m Priya, I handle fundraising, and I work with donors.”).
    • They toss the yarn to another participant, who repeats the process, creating a “web” of connections.
    • Debrief: Highlight how stakeholders are interconnected, setting the stage for the Integral Model.

2. Quadrant 1: Interior-Individual (I) – Personal Mindset and Values (20 minutes)
  • Focus: Explore personal motivations, biases, and emotional intelligence in stakeholder management.
  • Facilitator Actions:
    • Explain how personal values and emotions shape stakeholder interactions (e.g., empathy in donor relations, patience with vendors).
    • Share a brief example: “A fundraiser’s frustration with a donor’s delay might stem from personal stress, affecting the relationship.”
  • Activity: Reflective Journaling – Stakeholder Emotions (10 minutes)
    • Provide participants with a worksheet or paper.
    • Prompt: “Think of a recent stakeholder interaction (e.g., donor, vendor, colleague). What emotions did you feel? How did your mindset influence your approach? What values (e.g., trust, transparency) guided you?”
    • Participants write for 5 minutes, then pair up to share insights (5 minutes).
    • Debrief: Discuss how self-awareness can improve stakeholder engagement (e.g., managing frustration in vendor negotiations).
  • NGO Relevance: Helps employees reflect on their emotional triggers in high-stakes donor or vendor interactions.

3. Quadrant 2: Exterior-Individual (It) – Skills and Behaviors (25 minutes)
  • Focus: Develop practical skills and behaviors for effective stakeholder management.
  • Facilitator Actions:
    • Introduce key stakeholder management skills: active listening, clear communication, and negotiation.
    • Share a stakeholder mapping tool (e.g., Power-Interest Matrix) to prioritize stakeholders based on influence and interest.
  • Activity: Stakeholder Mapping and Role-Play (20 minutes)
    • Part 1: Mapping (10 minutes):
      • In small groups (3-4 participants), provide a blank Power-Interest Matrix (a 2x2 grid: High/Low Power vs. High/Low Interest).
      • Prompt: “List your NGO’s stakeholders (e.g., donors, vendors, social media followers, internal teams). Place them on the matrix based on their power (influence) and interest in your work.”
      • Example: High Power/High Interest = Major Donor; Low Power/High Interest = Social Media Followers.
    • Part 2: Role-Play (10 minutes):
      • Each group picks one stakeholder from their matrix (e.g., a high-power donor or a low-interest vendor).
      • Assign roles: one person plays the NGO employee, another the stakeholder, and others observe.
      • Scenario: The employee must engage the stakeholder (e.g., convince a donor to renew funding, negotiate with a vendor for better terms).
      • Observers provide feedback on communication skills and strategies.
    • Debrief: Discuss how behaviors (e.g., active listening, persuasion) vary by stakeholder type.
  • NGO Relevance: Equips employees with tools to prioritize stakeholders and practice communication tailored to fundraising, vendor management, or social media.

4. Quadrant 3: Interior-Collective (We) – Building Relationships and Culture (20 minutes)
  • Focus: Foster shared values and trust in stakeholder relationships.
  • Facilitator Actions:
    • Explain how a collaborative culture and shared values (e.g., transparency, mutual respect) strengthen stakeholder relationships.
    • Example: “A culture of openness in the NGO can build trust with donors and vendors.”
  • Activity: World Café – Building Trust with Stakeholders (15 minutes)
    • Set up 3-4 tables, each with a flipchart and a question:
      1. How can we build trust with donors through shared values?
      2. How can we foster collaboration with vendors or partners?
      3. How can internal team alignment improve stakeholder outcomes?
      4. (Optional) How can social media reflect our values to engage followers?
    • Participants rotate between tables every 5 minutes, discussing and noting ideas.
    • Final round: Each table summarizes key insights to the whole group.
    • Debrief: Highlight how a “We” focus creates a cohesive approach to stakeholder management.
  • NGO Relevance: Encourages employees to align fundraising, vendor relations, and social media with the NGO’s mission and values.

5. Quadrant 4: Exterior-Collective (Its) – Systems and Processes (20 minutes)
  • Focus: Design systems to support stakeholder management.
  • Facilitator Actions:
    • Discuss how systems (e.g., donor databases, vendor contracts, social media analytics) streamline stakeholder engagement.
    • Example: “A CRM system can track donor preferences, ensuring personalized communication.”
  • Activity: Process Design Challenge (15 minutes)
    • In small groups, assign each a stakeholder group (e.g., donors, vendors, social media audience).
    • Prompt: “Design a simple system or process to improve engagement with this stakeholder. Consider tools, workflows, or policies.”
      • Examples: A donor follow-up schedule, a vendor performance review process, a social media content calendar.
    • Groups present their ideas in 1-2 minutes each.
    • Debrief: Discuss how systems reduce workload and enhance efficiency.
  • NGO Relevance: Provides actionable ideas for expense control (e.g., vendor systems) and donor relations (e.g., CRM tools).

6. Integration and Action Planning (15 minutes)
  • Objective: Synthesize learnings and create actionable takeaways.
  • Facilitator Actions:
    • Revisit the Integral Model, summarizing how each quadrant contributes to stakeholder management:
      • I: Self-awareness improves emotional intelligence.
      • It: Skills like mapping and communication drive results.
      • We: Shared values build trust.
      • Its: Systems ensure consistency.
    • Facilitate a group discussion: “How can you apply one idea from each quadrant in your work?”
  • Activity: Commitment Cards (10 minutes)
    • Provide index cards or paper.
    • Prompt: “Write one action you’ll take in the next week to improve stakeholder management, considering all four quadrants.”
      • Example: “I’ll reflect on my emotions before donor meetings (I), practice active listening with vendors (It), align with my team on donor values (We), and update our donor tracker (Its).”
    • Participants share their commitments with a partner for accountability.
    • Collect cards (optional) to follow up post-workshop.
  • Debrief: Emphasize how integrating all quadrants creates holistic stakeholder management.

7. Closing and Q&A (5-10 minutes)
  • Facilitator Actions:
    • Summarize key takeaways: self-awareness, skills, relationships, and systems.
    • Invite questions or reflections from participants.
    • Share a resource list (e.g., stakeholder mapping templates, books like Stakeholder Theory by Freeman, or online CRM tools).
    • Thank participants and encourage them to stay connected for feedback or follow-up.
  • Activity: One-Word Takeaway (2 minutes)
    • Each participant shares one word summarizing their learning (e.g., “Trust,” “Systems,” “Empathy”).
    • End with a group cheer or clap to celebrate.

Materials Needed
  • Flipcharts, markers, and sticky notes.
  • Handouts: Power-Interest Matrix template, reflective journaling prompts.
  • Ball of yarn for icebreaker.
  • Index cards for commitment activity.
  • Projector/slides (optional) for Integral Model visual.
  • Whiteboard for quadrant diagram.
Facilitation Tips
  • Time Management: Stick to time limits for each segment; use a timer for activities.
  • Inclusivity: Ensure all voices are heard, especially in group discussions.
  • NGO Context: Tailor examples to fundraising, donor relations, vendor management, and social media.
  • Energy: Keep the session interactive with movement (e.g., World Café, icebreaker) to maintain engagement.
  • Adaptability: If time runs short, prioritize Quadrants 2 (It) and 4 (Its) for practical tools, or extend group activities for a 2-hour session.
Expected Outcomes
  • I: Employees gain self-awareness of their emotions and values in stakeholder interactions.
  • It: Practical skills (e.g., stakeholder mapping, communication) enhance donor and vendor engagement.
  • We: A stronger team culture aligns with stakeholder values, improving trust.
  • Its: Actionable systems streamline fundraising, expense control, and social media efforts.
This session design is concise yet comprehensive, leveraging the Integral Model to address the NGO’s unique stakeholder management needs. Let me know if you’d like to refine any part, add specific examples, or adjust for a particular audience segment!

Labels: